Teams

Players Club - Freeman

2024 Collier Adult 65 & Over ESL Fall · Adult 65 & over 7.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_7

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-12-11vs Pelican Marsh/ Betty Boops/ KobelSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLoyce Snyder / Karen Terzano vs Beverly Graham / Ilene Flack4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesKathleen Staudinger / Sharon Oppenheimer vs Pat Koepke / Judy Kobel6-3, 6-2
2023-12-04vs COLLIER /Howard/65&Over7.0WWon 20
W#2 DoublesMary Egan / Sharon Oppenheimer vs Judy Howell / Jincie Duane7-5, 6-4
W#3 DoublesSheryl Gebhart / Ann McDonald vs Catherine Kelly / Joanne Alexander7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2023-11-27vs Valencia Bonita - DoranWon 10
W#3 DoublesMary Egan / Sharon Oppenheimer vs Rita Leone / Patricia Doran6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2023-11-06vs Island Walk - SchmidtWon 20
W#1 DoublesKaren Terzano / Sue Wolf vs Linda Santo / Yvonne Horton7-5, 6-1
W#3 DoublesSharon Oppenheimer / Dodie Gallagher vs Linda Hermann / Sandra Pastoor6-1, 6-2
2023-10-31vs Longshore Lake - PallerSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKaren Terzano / Loyce Snyder vs Caroline Rogers / Janet Ellis6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMary Egan / Sharon Oppenheimer vs Virginia Southall / Peggy Sealfon7-6, 2-6, 1-0
2023-10-23vs Naples Reserve - L. KeelySplit 11
W#1 DoublesLoyce Snyder / Karen Terzano vs Carolyn Marek / Gloria Anderson6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesKathleen Staudinger / Ann McDonald vs Peggy Keigley / Dorothea Farmer1-6, 4-6
2023-10-16vs Marco YMCA - CorreaLost 01
L#2 DoublesAnn McDonald / Kathleen Staudinger vs Joan van Glabek / Karen Correa6-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 65 & over 7.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.10 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.18
Ann McDonald
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.16
Beth Kropko
published 3.5
3.06
Karen Terzano
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.98
Sharon Oppenheimer
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
Cindy Kedrowski
published
Patricia Freeman
published
Sue Wolf
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sharon Oppenheimer + Cindy Kedrowski6068% gamesnot enough data
Sue Wolf + Patricia Freeman3254% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ann McDonald
49W–56L career · 3 lines in 2024
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Beth Kropko
8W–11L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%<1%
3.16
3.5
Karen Terzano
52W–65L career · type A · 4 lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
3.06
3.5
Sharon Oppenheimer
84W–69L career · 5 lines in 2024
56%44%<1%
2.98
Cindy Kedrowski
48W–30L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Patricia Freeman
13W–9L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sue Wolf
11W–10L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.