Teams

Beerman No Fault Zone - K. Funk

2025 Polk Combo 18 & Over - Spring · 6.5 Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.31 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-06-12vs Lakeland - B. LansfordSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMelissa Darch / Karen Hogg vs Elizabeth Paul / Ellen Salm6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKandy Wood / Karola Cordero vs Ruthie Tait / Shannon Miles1-6, 1-6
2025-06-05vs Beerman - T. MarcewiczSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAnna Previte / Ginger Davis vs Tiffany Choe / Allison Sorenson6-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMelanie Langley / Karen Hogg vs Teresa Osborn / Tracey Ritter6-1, 6-0
2025-05-29vs WHCC - L. MasonLost 03
L#1 DoublesKarola Cordero / Jihyeon Choe vs Meghan Savant / Kathy Borders0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMelissa Darch / Ginger Davis vs Leilani Guinn / Courtney McCrystal4-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesJanese Dennis / Leisa Jordan vs Elizabeth Merritt / Dionne Kohl5-7, 5-7
2025-05-22vs WHC Dare Doubles - G. TardyWon 20
W#1 DoublesAnna Previte / Ginger Davis vs Sandy Ramsey / Brittany Rutherford6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKarola Cordero / Leisa Jordan vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-05-15Lost 02
L#1 DoublesMelanie Langley / Karen Hogg vs Janet Layug / Brittany Craig6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAnna Previte / Ginger Davis vs Joan Baldava / Ashley Bailey7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2025-05-08vs Lakeland - B. LansfordWon 10
W#1 DoublesAnna Previte / Ginger Davis vs Ellen Salm / Brandy Lansford6-3, 6-1
2025-05-01vs Beerman - T. MarcewiczWon 10
W#1 DoublesMelanie Langley / Ginger Davis vs Angela Johnson / Allison Sorenson6-4, 7-6
2025-04-24vs WHCC - L. MasonWon 21
W#1 DoublesAnna Previte / Ginger Davis vs Andrea Jahna / Leilani Guinn6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJanese Dennis / Laurie Grieger vs Lauren Mason / Courtney McCrystal6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMelissa Darch / Kandy Wood vs Amber Smith / Kathy Borders2-6, 3-6
2025-04-17vs WHC Dare Doubles - G. TardyWon 20
W#1 DoublesAnna Previte / Karen Hogg vs Geraldine Tardy / Sandy Ramsey6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMelissa Darch / Vanessa Barfield vs Karen Evans / Mandy Jarrett7-6, 6-7, 1-0
2025-04-10Split 11
L#1 DoublesAnna Previte / Ginger Davis vs Kerrie Hall / Amy Evans6-7, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJanese Dennis / Gwen Allen vs Lauren Lloyd / Tracy Achinger6-3, 1-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.94 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
Kimberly Funk
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.27
Janese Dennis
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.19
Anna Previte
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.15
Melanie Langley
published
3.07
Brandye Pickering
published 3.5
3.03
Melissa Darch
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.00
Karola Cordero
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.95
Ginger Davis
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.92
Karen Hogg
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.82
Gwen Allen
published 3
2.81
Laurie Grieger
published
2.80
Jihyeon Choe
published
2.73
Leisa Jordan
published
2.60
Vanessa Barfield
published
2.55
Kandy Wood
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melissa Darch + Anna Previte211750% games+9.1% vs expected
Ginger Davis + Anna Previte17757% games+7.3% vs expected
Melissa Darch + Janese Dennis71149% games−2.8% vs expected
Janese Dennis + Anna Previte4448% games−2.9% vs expected
Ginger Davis + Melissa Darch3451% gamesnot enough data
Ginger Davis + Karen Hogg2345% gamesnot enough data
Kandy Wood + Leisa Jordan1438% gamesnot enough data
Kandy Wood + Karen Hogg4158% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kimberly Funk
106W–112L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Janese Dennis
121W–115L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Anna Previte
99W–73L career · 7 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.19
Melanie Langley
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
13%87%<1%
3.15
3.5
Brandye Pickering
10W–9L career · no lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.07
3.5
Melissa Darch
63W–77L career · 4 lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
3.03
Karola Cordero
58W–67L career · 3 lines in 2025
52%48%<1%
3.00
3.5
Ginger Davis
113W–97L career · 8 lines in 2025
65%35%<1%
2.95
3
Karen Hogg
84W–99L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
2.92
3
Gwen Allen
6W–12L career · no lines in 2025
1%91%9%
2.82
Laurie Grieger
12W–18L career · no lines in 2025
1%92%7%
2.81
Jihyeon Choe
9W–11L career · no lines in 2025
1%92%7%
2.80
Leisa Jordan
5W–9L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
2.73
Vanessa Barfield
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
2.60
3
Kandy Wood
53W–82L career · 2 lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
2.55

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.