Teams

VALLEY VISTA RC/VVRC COURTS 18AM3.5A

2024 ADULT 18&Over · Men's 3.5

16 players · average NTRP 3.70 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-06-07Won 10
W#2 SinglesKeane Tarrosa vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-06-05vs MORAGA CC 18AM3.5AWon 10
W#1 SinglesKeane Tarrosa vs Cole Bennett6-2, 7-6
W#1 SinglesKeane Tarrosa vs Matthew Goldberg6-2, 6-4
2024-05-25vs PINOLE PK 18AM3.5AWon 10
W#2 SinglesKeane Tarrosa vs Matthew Mccormick6-2, 6-3
2024-05-18vs PLEASANTON 18AM3.5FWon 10
W#1 SinglesKeane Tarrosa vs Abhisek Sinha6-2, 6-2
2024-05-10Won 10
W#1 SinglesKeane Tarrosa vs Bradley Garcia6-1, 0-6, 1-0
2024-05-05vs MORAGA CC 18AM3.5AWon 10
W#2 SinglesKeane Tarrosa vs Sepand Joorabchi6-4, 6-4
W#2 SinglesKeane Tarrosa vs Nihaar Gupta6-1, 6-0
2024-04-08vs ROUND HILL CC 18AM3.5AWon 10
W#1 SinglesKeane Tarrosa vs Steve Brashear6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.40 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Keane Tarrosa
usually #1 Singles 46%, also #2 Singles 46% · published 4
3.68
Brian Hennessy
published 4
3.59
Jim Collins
published
3.55
John Gwynn
published
3.54
Jeff Bennett
published
3.43
3.39
Mark Joseph
published
3.33
Albert Blake
published 3.5
3.25
Shankar Krishna
published
AJ Canepa
published 3.5
Chris Dundon
published 3.5
3.00
Mark Keeling
published
2.82
Jonathan Degg
published
Ed Nakagawa
published
Joel Wanek
published
Thierry Dessange
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mark Joseph + Jim Collins5074% games+7.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Keane Tarrosa
95W–59L career · 13 lines in 2024
1%90%8%
3.81
4
Brian Hennessy
32W–11L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.68
Jim Collins
15W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%25%75%
3.59
John Gwynn
7W–4L career · no lines in 2024
35%65%<1%
3.55
Jeff Bennett
16W–14L career · no lines in 2024
<1%38%62%
3.54
Nicholas Mastrangelo
5W–10L career · no lines in 2024
68%32%<1%
3.43
Mark Joseph
10W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
3.39
3.5
Albert Blake
19W–19L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%11%
3.33
Shankar Krishna
0W–4L career · no lines in 2024
96%4%<1%
3.25
3.5
AJ Canepa
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Chris Dundon
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Mark Keeling
9W–18L career · no lines in 2024
<1%49%51%
3.00
Jonathan Degg
4W–5L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%9%
2.82
Ed Nakagawa
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Joel Wanek
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Thierry Dessange
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.