Teams

SC-Urie

2021 Adult 55 & Over · 9.0 MEN

6 players · average NTRP 4.30 / EASTERN WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2021-06-05vs YTC-MorrisonWon 21
W#1 DoublesDuke Dixon / Jeffery Urie vs Rob Knox / Angus Bampton6-0, 6-4
W#2 DoublesDavid Robin / Richard Henry vs Mark Villegas / Wally Morrison6-1, 7-5
L#3 DoublesCurt Andersen / Mark Sullivan vs Robert Schefter / David Elofson5-7, 7-6, 0-1
2021-06-05vs YTC-MorrisonWon 21
W#1 DoublesDavid Robin / Jeffery Urie vs Rob Knox / Angus Bampton6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesDuke Dixon / Craig Fager vs David Elofson / Jeff Brantner7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMark Sullivan / Richard Henry vs Jeffrey Petersen / Stephen Wallenfels6-4, 6-2
2021-06-04vs YTC-MorrisonWon 30
W#1 DoublesDavid Robin / Jeffery Urie vs Jeffrey Petersen / Stephen Wallenfels6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMark Sullivan / Duke Dixon vs Robert Schefter / Mark Villegas6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesCurt Andersen / Craig Fager vs Jeff Brantner / Wally Morrison3-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · 9.0 MEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SC-Urie3072559

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.93 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Duke Dixon
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.23
Jeffery Urie
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.12
David Robin
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.79
Craig Fager
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.60
Curt Andersen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Richard Henry
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Curt Andersen + Craig Fager61341% games+5.4% vs expected
Jeffery Urie + David Robin18862% games+0.5% vs expected
Curt Andersen + David Robin3260% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Duke Dixon
24W–8L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
4.5
Jeffery Urie
61W–28L career · 3 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
4.23
4.5
David Robin
74W–40L career · 3 lines in 2021
18%82%<1%
4.12
4
Craig Fager
14W–28L career · 2 lines in 2021
1%93%5%
3.79
4
Curt Andersen
19W–32L career · 2 lines in 2021
23%77%<1%
3.60
Richard Henry
7W–0L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.