Teams

YTC-Morrison

2021 Adult 55 & Over · 9.0 MEN

8 players · average NTRP 4.08 / EASTERN WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2021-06-05vs SC-UrieLost 12
L#1 DoublesRob Knox / Angus Bampton vs Duke Dixon / Jeffery Urie0-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMark Villegas / Wally Morrison vs David Robin / Richard Henry1-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesRobert Schefter / David Elofson vs Curt Andersen / Mark Sullivan7-5, 6-7, 1-0
2021-06-05vs SC-UrieLost 12
L#1 DoublesRob Knox / Angus Bampton vs David Robin / Jeffery Urie0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesDavid Elofson / Jeff Brantner vs Duke Dixon / Craig Fager6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJeffrey Petersen / Stephen Wallenfels vs Mark Sullivan / Richard Henry4-6, 2-6
2021-06-04vs SC-UrieLost 03
L#1 DoublesJeffrey Petersen / Stephen Wallenfels vs David Robin / Jeffery Urie1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesRobert Schefter / Mark Villegas vs Mark Sullivan / Duke Dixon1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJeff Brantner / Wally Morrison vs Curt Andersen / Craig Fager6-3, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 9.0 MEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.84 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Angus Bampton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.09
Robert Schefter
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.90
Jeff Brantner
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.79
Wally Morrison
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.77
Mark Villegas
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.66
David Elofson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
Jeffrey Petersen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Rob Knox
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Wally Morrison + Jeff Brantner141155% games+6.2% vs expected
David Elofson + Jeff Brantner51151% games−2.4% vs expected
David Elofson + Robert Schefter12654% gamesnot enough data
Wally Morrison + David Elofson3943% gamesnot enough data
Wally Morrison + Robert Schefter6357% gamesnot enough data
Wally Morrison + Mark Villegas4450% gamesnot enough data
Jeff Brantner + Mark Villegas3352% gamesnot enough data
Jeff Brantner + Robert Schefter3260% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Angus Bampton
0W–5L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Robert Schefter
55W–34L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%24%76%
4.09
4
Jeff Brantner
38W–46L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%79%21%
3.90
4
Wally Morrison
42W–49L career · 2 lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.79
4
Mark Villegas
26W–28L career · 2 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.77
4
David Elofson
37W–47L career · 2 lines in 2021
11%88%<1%
3.66
Jeffrey Petersen
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Rob Knox
20W–27L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.