Teams

Dobbins/Borthwick - Get A Grip

2024 Adult 18 & Over Winter · 3.5 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTHERN

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-01-29vs Ehle/Henke Winter 18+Won 10
W#2 DoublesPam Bowden / Ruth Eliason vs Stephanie Dean / Linda Bieza6-1, 6-1
2024-01-22vs Overdahl/DymitWon 10
W#1 DoublesEllen Dobbins / Ruth Eliason vs Renee McCloden / Megan Chicos6-2, 6-1
2024-01-08vs Farrington/Howard W24Won 10
W#1 DoublesRuth Eliason / Joanie Gold vs Ann Fort / Laura Farrington6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.68
Christina Larson
published 3.5
3.49
Pam Bowden
published
3.48
Emily Starita
published 3.5
3.43
Ellen Dobbins
published 3.5
3.42
Carrie Stolar
published 3.5
3.37
Ruth Eliason
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.32
Jennifer Warren
published
3.27
Melodie Marx
published
3.25
Amy Tjornhom
published 3.5
3.24
Maggie Hillmer
published
3.09
Cory Borthwick
published 3.5
3.09
Joanie Gold
published
3.04
Michelle Sandberg
published
2.96
Shagu Heal
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ellen Dobbins + Carrie Stolar10259% games+8.8% vs expected
Jennifer Warren + Emily Starita141556% games+1.7% vs expected
Maggie Hillmer + Melodie Marx191352% games−2.9% vs expected
Shagu Heal + Michelle Sandberg2641% games−7.9% vs expected
Joanie Gold + Ellen Dobbins4146% gamesnot enough data
Ellen Dobbins + Ruth Eliason314 matchesnot enough data
Ellen Dobbins + Christina Larson314 matchesnot enough data
Ruth Eliason + Pam Bowden224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Christina Larson
30W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%8%92%
3.68
Pam Bowden
31W–16L career · no lines in 2024
<1%53%47%
3.49
3.5
Emily Starita
38W–31L career · no lines in 2024
<1%57%43%
3.48
3.5
Ellen Dobbins
50W–19L career · no lines in 2024
<1%71%29%
3.43
3.5
Carrie Stolar
32W–18L career · no lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
3.42
Ruth Eliason
263W–178L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%84%16%
3.37
Jennifer Warren
26W–27L career · no lines in 2024
1%91%9%
3.32
Melodie Marx
25W–19L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Amy Tjornhom
7W–13L career · no lines in 2024
3%95%3%
3.25
Maggie Hillmer
31W–24L career · no lines in 2024
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Cory Borthwick
22W–23L career · type A · no lines in 2024
23%76%<1%
3.09
Joanie Gold
15W–8L career · no lines in 2024
25%75%<1%
3.09
Michelle Sandberg
7W–12L career · no lines in 2024
37%63%<1%
3.04
Shagu Heal
9W–19L career · no lines in 2024
63%37%<1%
2.96

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.