Teams

CV LLW-Palm Springs TC/Baughman & K Rogers

2025 SCTA Adult 65 & Over - CV · CV Women 7.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for CV Women 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.65
Mona Knudslien
published
3.60
Kathy Rogers
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.35
Suzette Willetts
published
3.31
Deborah Lands
published 3.5
3.18
Susan Lewis
published
3.18
Carolyn Wright
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.15
Lindy Gaylord
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.13
Diane Drake
published 3.5
3.11
Paula Doritty
published
Lorene Peirce
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Michele Weddle
published
Patricia Baughman
published
Susan Caruso
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathy Rogers + Susan Caruso4446% gamesnot enough data
Michele Weddle + Diane Drake2443% gamesnot enough data
Michele Weddle + Patricia Baughman134 matchesnot enough data
Kathy Rogers + Lorene Peirce224 matchesnot enough data
Lorene Peirce + Lindy Gaylord404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mona Knudslien
5W–3L career · no lines in 2025
15%85%1%
3.65
3.5
Kathy Rogers
108W–60L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%23%77%
3.60
Suzette Willetts
13W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%14%
3.35
3.5
Deborah Lands
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
Susan Lewis
20W–12L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Carolyn Wright
93W–84L career · 3 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Lindy Gaylord
68W–39L career · 2 lines in 2025
15%84%1%
3.15
3.5
Diane Drake
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
3.13
Paula Doritty
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.11
Lorene Peirce
45W–26L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Michele Weddle
7W–20L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Patricia Baughman
6W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Susan Caruso
12W–7L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.