Teams

IE-LLW-APTC-Ruby Villanueva

2022 SCTA Tri-Level 18 & Over - IE · IE Women 4.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.58 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-09-10vs IE-CCCC-Amy Taylor/Sesilie KayLost 02
L#1 DoublesAmy Growsky / Beverly Hunt vs Jennifer Kries / Shirley Landers6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesGINA SKIBAR / Dionna Growsky vs Stephanie Ells / Heidi Brun4-6, 2-6
2022-08-27vs IE-CCCC-Amy Taylor/Sesilie KaySplit 11
W#1 DoublesAmy Growsky / Jane Whitney vs Kathalena Cocker / Holly Greywood6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJennifer Daniels / Connie DeLong vs Amy Garrett / Cristina Hamlin2-6, 2-6
2022-08-21vs IE-CCCC-Amy Taylor/Sesilie KayWon 20
W#1 DoublesBeverly Hunt / Amy Growsky vs Ashley Knoblach / Holly Greywood6-1, 7-6
W#2 DoublesConnie DeLong / Jennifer Daniels vs Dana Olague / Sesilie Kay7-6, 6-4
2022-08-13vs IE-CCCC-Amy Taylor/Sesilie KayLost 01
L#2 DoublesCleo Collier / Erin Growsky vs Amy Garrett / Sesilie Kay7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2022-08-07vs IE-CCCC-Amy Taylor/Sesilie KayLost 12
L#1 DoublesAmy Growsky / Laila Gomulka vs Ashley Knoblach / Jennifer Kries3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesConnie DeLong / Erin Growsky vs Dana Olague / Sesilie Kay6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesDorothy Geiger / GINA SKIBAR vs Elizabeth Rydall / Stephanie Ells6-7, 2-6
2022-07-31vs IE-CCCC-Amy Taylor/Sesilie KayWon 10
W#2 DoublesCleo Collier / Ruby Villanueva vs Sesilie Kay / Amy Garrett2-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for IE Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.46 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Tammy Pronenko
published
3.79
Jane Whitney
published
3.73
Amy Growsky
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.68
Laila Gomulka
published
3.46
Michelle He
published
3.35
Connie DeLong
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.33
Cleo Collier
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.29
Jennifer Daniels
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.10
GINA SKIBAR
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.07
Dorothy Geiger
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

GINA SKIBAR + Dorothy Geiger6455% games+5.8% vs expected
Connie DeLong + Jennifer Daniels2342% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tammy Pronenko
11W–10L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.81
Jane Whitney
7W–0L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.79
4
Amy Growsky
37W–20L career · 4 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
Laila Gomulka
8W–7L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.68
Michelle He
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
61%39%<1%
3.46
3.5
Connie DeLong
49W–49L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
Cleo Collier
88W–64L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Jennifer Daniels
116W–105L career · type A · 2 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.29
3.5
GINA SKIBAR
114W–80L career · 2 lines in 2022
21%78%<1%
3.10
3.5
Dorothy Geiger
58W–51L career · no lines in 2022
29%71%<1%
3.07

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.