Teams

RVW - Bohanan

2026 CSRATA USTA Adult 18 & Over - Spring '26 · Women 3.0

11 players · average NTRP 2.88 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-03-22vs NTC - DowdeyWon 32
W#1 DoublesErika Pracht / Kayla Kranenberg vs Marilyn Nichols / Maria Richard7-5, 0-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJaclyn Bohanan vs Shea Mize3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesVenus Amiri / Camila Gomez Canel vs Monica Adee / Amy Wagner6-1, 6-2
W#2 SinglesAshley Rosema vs Angela Crawford6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesKatie Vargas / Abby Ellis vs Sandra Dowdey / Morgan Brinson2-6, 3-6
2026-03-01vs Woodside - HodgesWon 30
W#1 DoublesJaclyn Bohanan / Ashley Rosema vs Melissa Lackey-Oremus / Lauren Duckworth5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesErika Pracht / Kayla Kranenberg vs Angela Hodges / Helen Faulk7-6, 6-0
W#3 DoublesKatie Vargas / Camila Gomez Canel vs Vickie Brown / Jodie Cha7-6, 6-4
2026-03-01vs CCRC - BernardiWon 21
L#1 DoublesCamila Gomez Canel / Brooke Weeks vs Qingdan Wu / Guanyu Li1-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesAshley Rosema vs Cing Thang6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKayla Kranenberg / Lisa Bell vs Kim White / Tanya Gibbons6-2, 6-4
2026-02-22vs RVW - BaldyWon 31
W#1 DoublesSandra Scott / Camila Gomez Canel vs Wendy Wiggins / Sheri Brackett7-5, 6-3
W#1 SinglesAshley Rosema vs Alexis Shaefer6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKayla Kranenberg / Lisa Bell vs Dana McElmurray / Caitlin Brant5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 SinglesErika Pracht vs Saranne Perman2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-02-19vs NTC - ClausenWon 32
W#1 DoublesAshley Rosema / Camila Gomez Canel vs Russul Abbas / Sun Je6-3, 6-0
L#1 SinglesJaclyn Bohanan vs Felicia Clausen0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKayla Kranenberg / Venus Amiri vs Sharonne Calvin / Kathryn Lindsey6-7, 0-6
W#2 SinglesErika Pracht vs Erin Birdsong6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesLisa Bell / Veronica Ryans vs Valerie Haas / April Ewing6-4, 6-3
2026-02-08vs CSRATA/Tracie AddymanLost 04
L#1 DoublesAshley Rosema / Erika Pracht vs Jennifer Olmstead / Caroline Sullivan3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesJaclyn Bohanan vs Julianne Harrod3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRenee Copeland / Kayla Kranenberg vs Laraine Beasley / Brittnee Johnson3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesVeronica Ryans / Brooke Weeks vs Nora Rader / Erin Otis5-7, 1-6
2026-02-06vs RVW - HarperWon 31
L#1 DoublesErika Pracht / Brooke Weeks vs Debbie Christy / KRISTY ZGOL2-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesAshley Rosema vs Dori Cash7-5, 6-0
W#2 DoublesLisa Bell / Camila Gomez Canel vs Donna Kennaday / Tonya Porter6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesVenus Amiri / Veronica Ryans vs Sharon Kendrick / Kristi Crowder6-0, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · Women 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CSRATA/Tracie Addyman7030515238
2RVW - Bohanan52201533289
3CCRC - Bernardi34171840305

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.57 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.00
Ashley Rosema
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.87
Camila Gomez Canel
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.84
Jaclyn Bohanan
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.67
Erika Pracht
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.62
Kayla Kranenberg
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
2.47
Brooke Weeks
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.45
Veronica Ryans
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.38
Venus Amiri
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.36
Katie Vargas
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 30% · published
2.30
Abby Ellis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.30
Renee Copeland
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Erika Pracht + Jaclyn Bohanan3247% gamesnot enough data
Renee Copeland + Veronica Ryans134 matchesnot enough data
Kayla Kranenberg + Erika Pracht213 matchesnot enough data
Kayla Kranenberg + Camila Gomez Canel303 matchesnot enough data
Camila Gomez Canel + Venus Amiri213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Ashley Rosema
6W–1L career · type S · 7 lines in 2026
<1%50%50%
3.00
3
Camila Gomez Canel
14W–10L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
2.87
Jaclyn Bohanan
19W–27L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
2.84
Erika Pracht
17W–36L career · 6 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
2.67
Kayla Kranenberg
12W–17L career · 6 lines in 2026
20%79%<1%
2.62
3
Brooke Weeks
0W–5L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
58%42%<1%
2.47
Veronica Ryans
3W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
64%36%<1%
2.45
Venus Amiri
8W–6L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%80%20%
2.38
Katie Vargas
16W–20L career · 10 lines in 2026
0%84%16%
2.36
2.5
Abby Ellis
7W–4L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
0%93%7%
2.30
Renee Copeland
3W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
93%7%<1%
2.30

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.