Teams

RVW - Baldy

2026 CSRATA USTA Adult 18 & Over - Spring '26 · Women 3.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-03-22vs RVW - HarperSplit 22
W#1 SinglesNichelle Protho vs Jenni Scott6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesWendy Wiggins / Kay Dean vs Debbie Christy / Donna Kennaday5-7, 4-6
L#2 SinglesAlexis Shaefer vs Lauren Freed4-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesSheri Brackett / Melisa DeAngel vs Kristi Crowder / Tonya Porter6-1, 6-2
2026-03-11vs Woodside - HodgesLost 23
L#1 DoublesDana McElmurray / Wendy Wiggins vs Caroline Day / Elizabeth Anderson1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#1 SinglesNichelle Protho vs Katie Tate6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesSheri Brackett / Rachel McFatridge vs Kari DeLoach / Jodie Cha2-6, 6-7
W#2 SinglesAlexis Shaefer vs Lauren Duckworth7-6, 6-1
L#3 DoublesKay Dean / Caitlin Brant vs Paige Tiffany / Vickie Brown2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2026-03-01vs NTC - DowdeyWon 32
L#1 DoublesLyndi Baldy / Sheri Brackett vs Marilyn Nichols / Maria Richard3-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesNichelle Protho vs Emily Ann Lively6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDana McElmurray / Wendy Wiggins vs Morgan Brinson / Michelle Tordoff6-2, 7-5
L#2 SinglesSaranne Perman vs Shea Mize2-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesMelinda Cato / Rachel McFatridge vs Tope Obielodan / Judy Boykin6-3, 6-3
2026-02-22vs RVW - BohananLost 13
L#1 DoublesWendy Wiggins / Sheri Brackett vs Sandra Scott / Camila Gomez Canel5-7, 3-6
L#1 SinglesAlexis Shaefer vs Ashley Rosema3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesDana McElmurray / Caitlin Brant vs Kayla Kranenberg / Lisa Bell7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesSaranne Perman vs Erika Pracht6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2026-02-12vs CCRC - BernardiLost 12
L#1 DoublesSheri Brackett / Lyndi Baldy vs Jocelyn Lagmay / Kim White3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAlexis Shaefer vs Maggie Smith3-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesDana McElmurray / Rachel McFatridge vs Pam Callaway / Erica Pratt6-4, 6-1
2026-02-11vs CSRATA/Tracie AddymanLost 13
L#1 DoublesLyndi Baldy / Sheri Brackett vs Laraine Beasley / Samantha Otis6-7, 1-6
L#1 SinglesNichelle Protho vs Anna Bianca7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesAlexis Shaefer vs Brittnee Johnson2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesRita Bell / Caitlin Brant vs Nora Rader / Kirstin Shaffer7-6, 6-1
2026-02-08vs NTC - ClausenSplit 22
W#1 DoublesSheri Brackett / Lyndi Baldy vs Danielle Davidson / Breonna Moore6-3, 6-4
W#1 SinglesNichelle Protho vs Kathryn Lindsey6-3, 6-2
L#2 SinglesSaranne Perman vs Felicia Clausen1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesRachel McFatridge / Wendy Wiggins vs Naiomi Giron / April Ewing6-4, 5-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.72 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.04
Nichelle Protho
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #3 Doubles 10% · published
2.81
Sheri Brackett
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published
2.81
Alexis Shaefer
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3
2.81
Wendy Wiggins
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.80
Lyndi Baldy
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
2.79
Rita Bell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.74
Dana McElmurray
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.68
Caitlin Brant
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.67
Rachel McFatridge
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.58
Melinda Cato
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.54
Saranne Perman
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.54
Melisa DeAngel
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
2.52
Kay Dean
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Wendy Wiggins + Dana McElmurray5356% games+1.5% vs expected
Lyndi Baldy + Sheri Brackett101749% games+1.3% vs expected
Wendy Wiggins + Rita Bell7452% games−0.3% vs expected
Lyndi Baldy + Melisa DeAngel033 matchesnot enough data
Wendy Wiggins + Sheri Brackett123 matchesnot enough data
Melinda Cato + Dana McElmurray123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nichelle Protho
16W–8L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%38%62%
3.04
Sheri Brackett
20W–27L career · 7 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
2.81
3
Alexis Shaefer
24W–30L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
2.81
Wendy Wiggins
23W–23L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
2.81
Lyndi Baldy
18W–43L career · 12 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
2.80
Rita Bell
15W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Dana McElmurray
11W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.74
3
Caitlin Brant
1W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
2.68
Rachel McFatridge
6W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
2.67
Melinda Cato
6W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
2.58
Saranne Perman
9W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%39%61%
2.54
Melisa DeAngel
8W–25L career · 7 lines in 2026
40%60%<1%
2.54
Kay Dean
1W–10L career · 5 lines in 2026
44%56%<1%
2.52

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.