Teams

KNO PINK

2021 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 3.39 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-06-03vs KC GREENWon 31
W#1 SinglesNancy Crease vs Katie Beers6-7, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Baesman / Joane Keran vs Dawn Robbins / Julia Zawalski6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesLucy Floyd vs Kara Robbins3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Zenk / Jane Webster vs Laurie Lopez / Erica Lopez6-3, 6-3
2021-05-27vs HV ORANGELost 14
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Zenk / Nancy Crease vs Ashley Festoso / Kris LaValley4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#1 SinglesLucy Floyd vs Courtney Gordanier6-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesBeth Cooper / Jane Webster vs Mim Lyles / Angela Martorella4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 SinglesKelly Lownsberry vs Holly Gant1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesKim Haverly / Elizabeth Baesman vs Heather Mantel / Amy Dawson4-6, 4-6
2021-05-20vs HG TEALLost 13
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Zenk / Kelly Lownsberry vs Mollie Smith / Kristen Dimig4-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesDebbie Lew vs Whitney Cain6-0, 6-1
L#2 SinglesElizabeth Baesman vs Kimerle Campbell3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesLucy Floyd / Jane Webster vs Maria Blakney / Jane Lundwall6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2021-05-13vs SSH BLUEWon 30
W#1 SinglesDebbie Lew vs Amy Mohr6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesBeth Cooper / Nancy Crease vs Cheryl Perez / Lindsay Fisher6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesLucy Floyd / Elizabeth Zenk vs Lisa DeBastos / Jill Nelson6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2021-05-06vs LTFC GOLDWon 32
L#1 DoublesNancy Crease / Beth Cooper vs Lindsay Piepgras / Rebecca Franciscus5-7, 3-6
W#1 SinglesDebbie Lew vs Lynn Pearson6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesLucy Floyd / Kim Haverly vs Theresa Gilpatrick / Annette Nueske6-2, 7-5
W#2 SinglesKelly Lownsberry vs Alison Smith6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Baesman / Joane Keran vs Katherine Hartzler / Celine Ormond0-6, 2-6
2021-04-29vs WC REDLost 13
W#1 SinglesDebbie Lew vs Naomi Fisher6-4, 7-6
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Zenk / Nancy Crease vs MaryBeth Doerr / Holly Smith6-0, 6-7, 0-1
L#2 SinglesKelly Lownsberry vs Laura Else6-7, 6-7
L#3 DoublesJane Webster / Kim Haverly vs Annette Nowak-Haniford / Anasa Shank2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2021-04-22vs HFII REDLost 04
L#1 DoublesJane Webster / Joane Keran vs Kim MacKendrick / Lauren Landen2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesDebbie Lew vs Melissa Wern4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Baesman / Kelly Lownsberry vs Jennifer Frontz / Mary Roth4-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesKim Haverly / Lucy Floyd vs Kara Carey / Emily Zadvorny2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.66
Debbie Lew
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.29
Nancy Crease
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.24
Kelly Lownsberry
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.24
Kim Haverly
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.20
Elizabeth Zenk
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.92
Elizabeth Baesman
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.91
Beth Cooper
published 3.5
2.88
Lucy Floyd
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.65
Jane Webster
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
Joane Keran
published
Theresa Hendrix
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elizabeth Zenk + Kim Haverly5354% games+7.4% vs expected
Elizabeth Zenk + Nancy Crease8265% games+6.5% vs expected
Elizabeth Zenk + Joane Keran12856% games+4.5% vs expected
Kelly Lownsberry + Jane Webster1538% games+3.8% vs expected
Elizabeth Zenk + Kelly Lownsberry4448% games+3.3% vs expected
Lucy Floyd + Kelly Lownsberry3248% games+2.5% vs expected
Elizabeth Baesman + Kelly Lownsberry51145% games+1.5% vs expected
Kim Haverly + Joane Keran3250% games+0.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Debbie Lew
58W–42L career · 5 lines in 2021
12%88%<1%
3.66
3.5
Nancy Crease
116W–53L career · 5 lines in 2021
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Kelly Lownsberry
108W–79L career · 5 lines in 2021
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Kim Haverly
75W–76L career · 4 lines in 2021
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Elizabeth Zenk
174W–106L career · 5 lines in 2021
6%93%1%
3.20
3
Elizabeth Baesman
121W–122L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%73%27%
2.92
3.5
Beth Cooper
37W–76L career · type A · no lines in 2021
76%24%<1%
2.91
3
Lucy Floyd
49W–78L career · 6 lines in 2021
<1%83%17%
2.88
3
Jane Webster
68W–125L career · 5 lines in 2021
12%88%<1%
2.65
Joane Keran
27W–24L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Theresa Hendrix
14W–32L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.