Teams

WC RED

2021 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER

9 players · average NTRP 3.75 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-06-03vs HV ORANGEWon 10
W#3 DoublesMary Ann Martin / Melody Sattizahn vs Darcy Dicus / Courtney Gordanier6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2021-05-27vs HG TEALLost 01
L#1 DoublesMelody Sattizahn / Kyle Davis vs Whitney Cain / Ashley Herndon1-6, 0-6
2021-05-20vs SSH BLUELost 01
L#2 DoublesMelody Sattizahn / Kyle Davis vs Cheryl Sanders / Cody Sherrod4-6, 4-6
2021-05-13vs LTFC GOLDLost 01
L#2 DoublesKyle Davis / Melody Sattizahn vs Alison Cejka / Theresa Gilpatrick1-6, 4-6
2021-05-06vs HFII REDLost 01
L#3 DoublesMelody Sattizahn / Annette Nowak-Haniford vs Emily Zadvorny / Kara Carey6-7, 1-6
2021-04-29vs KNO PINKLost 01
L#1 DoublesMelody Sattizahn / Kristin Linhardt vs Brittany Block / Theresa Hendrix7-5, 5-7, 0-1
2021-04-22vs KC GREENLost 01
L#1 DoublesMelody Sattizahn / Connie Anderson vs Beth Beers / Sally Heaton4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.03 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.58
Anasa Shank
published 4
3.33
Naomi Fisher
published
3.21
Laura Else
published
3.14
Melody Sattizahn
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
2.71
Kristin Linhardt
published
2.67
MaryBeth Doerr
published
2.58
Kyle Davis
published
Mary Ann Martin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melody Sattizahn + MaryBeth Doerr2541% games+2.5% vs expected
Kyle Davis + Melody Sattizahn3541% games+1.8% vs expected
Mary Ann Martin + Melody Sattizahn1539% games−1.6% vs expected
Kyle Davis + Kristin Linhardt93142% games−4.0% vs expected
Mary Ann Martin + MaryBeth Doerr21135% games−6.1% vs expected
Melody Sattizahn + Laura Else314 matchesnot enough data
Kyle Davis + MaryBeth Doerr033 matchesnot enough data
Melody Sattizahn + Naomi Fisher213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Anasa Shank
100W–51L career · type A · no lines in 2021
27%73%<1%
3.58
Naomi Fisher
58W–19L career · no lines in 2021
1%90%10%
3.33
Laura Else
39W–15L career · no lines in 2021
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Melody Sattizahn
78W–121L career · 7 lines in 2021
13%86%<1%
3.14
Kristin Linhardt
19W–45L career · no lines in 2021
5%93%1%
2.71
MaryBeth Doerr
48W–96L career · no lines in 2021
10%90%1%
2.67
Kyle Davis
22W–63L career · no lines in 2021
27%73%<1%
2.58
Annette Nowak-Haniford
0W–5L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Mary Ann Martin
8W–28L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.