Teams

PBurks (Life Time)

2023 Singles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Singles 4.0 Women - Mon PM

9 players · average NTRP 4.14 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-07-31Lost 01
L#1 SinglesEmily Weigel vs Megan Hunter3-6, 4-6
2023-07-24Split 11
L#1 SinglesEmily Weigel vs Claire Lieberman0-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesAmanda Patrocino vs Caitlin Steele6-3, 6-3
2023-07-17vs MGriffin/STo (Queens)Split 11
L#1 SinglesChelse Stevens vs Kim Cochran2-6, 1-6
W#3 SinglesEmily Weigel vs Sandra To6-3, 6-1
2023-07-10vs KCantrell (Park Rd)Won 21
W#1 SinglesEmily Weigel vs Susan Sullivan7-6, 6-3
W#2 SinglesAmanda Patrocino vs Christina Thigpen6-1, 6-3
L#3 SinglesPamela Burks vs Brantlee Green4-6, 1-6
2023-07-03Won 30
W#1 SinglesEmily Weigel vs Sydney McKinney7-6, 6-2
W#2 SinglesChelse Stevens vs Sarah Campbell7-6, 6-3
W#3 SinglesPamela Burks vs Emily Patterson5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2023-07-02vs KCantrell (Park Rd)Split 11
L#1 SinglesChelse Stevens vs Susan Sullivan2-6, 5-7
W#2 SinglesEmily Weigel vs Lauren Pruett Strickler6-1, 6-4
2023-06-26vs MGriffin/STo (Queens)Lost 02
L#1 SinglesAnna Kamenova vs Kim Cochran3-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesChelse Stevens vs Jessica Outterson3-6, 6-7
2023-06-12vs SGraham/MChaney (Queens)Won 10
W#3 SinglesAmanda Patrocino vs Sophie Graham6-4, 7-5
2023-06-05vs MGriffin/STo (Queens)Lost 02
L#1 SinglesChelse Stevens vs Kim Cochran3-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesAnna Kamenova vs Jenni Beasley5-7, 6-2, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Singles 4.0 Women - Mon PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.79 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.10
Amanda Patrocino
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 4.5
3.97
Emily Weigel
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 17% · published 4
3.96
Christina Peterson
published 4.5
3.93
Chelse Stevens
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 4
3.74
J Lowe
published
3.68
Anna Kamenova
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4
3.53
Pamela Burks
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
3.42
Cynthia Waldrop
published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amanda Patrocino + Chelse Stevens5256% gamesnot enough data
Pamela Burks + Emily Weigel3349% gamesnot enough data
Christina Peterson + Amanda Patrocino303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Amanda Patrocino
176W–39L career · 3 lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
4.10
4
Emily Weigel
162W–80L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%59%41%
3.97
4.5
Christina Peterson
65W–35L career · no lines in 2023
62%38%<1%
3.96
4
Chelse Stevens
136W–81L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%70%30%
3.93
4
Christine Pringle
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
J Lowe
6W–2L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.74
4
Anna Kamenova
69W–57L career · 2 lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.68
Pamela Burks
207W–133L career · 2 lines in 2023
42%58%<1%
3.53
4
Cynthia Waldrop
6W–7L career · no lines in 2023
71%29%<1%
3.42

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.