← Search

Pamela Burks

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Mint Hill, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
378 matches · 230W–148L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history378 matches
W
Default
2026-09-09 · CPeterson/MSutherland (Life Time) · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Cheri King
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-06-17 · EWeigel/PBurks (Life Time) · #2 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-20 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Haahs championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-06 · MSutherland/Peterson (Life Time) · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Emily Weigel
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-04 · CHelms/THolwager (Lifetime) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kandi Jackson
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-24 · THolwager/Helms (Lifetime) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cindi Helms
loading the estimate
0-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-04-22 · MSutherland/Peterson (Life Time) · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Cindi Helms
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-20 · CHelms/THolwager (Lifetime) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brenda Sweeney
loading the estimate
0-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-04-17 · THolwager/Helms (Lifetime) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cindi Helms
loading the estimate
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-15 · MSutherland/Peterson (Life Time) · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Michele Sutherland
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-04-01 · MSutherland/Peterson (Life Time) · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Cindi Helms
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-03-29 · MCTA18/HartB/RHTC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cheri King
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams84 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
0.0
71.4%
5W–2L · 49.2% of games
3.5
92.9%
26W–2L · 70.9% of games
4.0
62.6%
92W–55L · 55.2% of games
4.5
25%
8W–24L · 38.7% of games
6.5
83.3%
15W–3L · 57.8% of games
7.5
61.8%
42W–26L · 54.1% of games
8.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.5
43.9%
18W–23L · 48.6% of games
4.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 52.6% of games
4.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
61.9%
13W–8L · 53.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
137 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
107 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
81 matches
#2 Singles
6%
23 matches
#3 Singles
3%
13 matches
#1 Singles
3%
12 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe