Teams

A40 3.0M NR Corts

2022 NEOTA Adult 40 & Over · NEOTA A40&O 3.0 Men

13 players · average NTRP 3.38 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2022-07-12vs A40 3.0M PM SanchezWon 50
W#1 DoublesMichael Boukzam / Kevin Doss vs John Richardson / Ben Gilbert6-3, 6-0
W#1 SinglesABHIJIT NATH vs Roderick Yamat6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesBen Zagorski / James Wang vs Rob Skidmore / Jonathan Glazer6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDenis Zaharija / Robert Rosenau vs Michael Kenny / Chad Wilson6-0, 6-0
W#4 DoublesRajender Singh / Matthew Shepherd vs Brian Seitz / Andrew Chan6-4, 6-1
2022-06-07vs A40 3.0M NC BooherWon 31
W#1 SinglesABHIJIT NATH vs Munir Ahmad6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMichael Boukzam / Ben Zagorski vs Jason Kabbara / MICHAEL GIBSON6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesRobert Rosenau / Denis Zaharija vs William Emley / David Tates7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#4 DoublesRobert Corts / Matthew Shepherd vs Mel Paulino / Elbert Enrique5-7, 1-6
2022-05-24vs A40 3.0M MV BeebeWon 41
W#1 DoublesCraig Warner / Kevin Doss vs Brandon Carrus / Michael Sreshta6-2, 6-2
L#1 SinglesABHIJIT NATH vs Nicholas Fasola2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMichael Boukzam / James Wang vs Scott Limestoll / Ryan White6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRobert Rosenau / Denis Zaharija vs David Frederick / Ravi Krishnan6-2, 7-5
W#4 DoublesRobert Corts / Leif Christman vs Robert Haught / Kern Jolibois6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NEOTA A40&O 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.00 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Craig Warner
published 3.5
Denis Zaharija
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.15
Michael Boukzam
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.11
Robert Corts
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
3.04
Ben Zagorski
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.03
ABHIJIT NATH
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #4 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
2.94
Matthew Shepherd
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
2.90
Vasile Katsaros
published
2.80
Robert Rosenau
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kevin Doss
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Lars Traner
published
Leif Christman
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
Rajender Singh
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Robert Corts + Michael Boukzam5163% games+11.7% vs expected
Robert Rosenau + Michael Boukzam6264% games+9.2% vs expected
Kevin Doss + Michael Boukzam12261% games+7.0% vs expected
Robert Rosenau + Robert Corts9952% games−5.2% vs expected
Robert Corts + Ben Zagorski4266% gamesnot enough data
Michael Boukzam + Ben Zagorski3254% gamesnot enough data
Robert Rosenau + Ben Zagorski224 matchesnot enough data
Robert Corts + Matthew Shepherd314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Craig Warner
102W–43L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Denis Zaharija
47W–25L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Michael Boukzam
65W–26L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%12%88%
3.15
Robert Corts
96W–41L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%19%81%
3.11
3
Ben Zagorski
73W–45L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%39%61%
3.04
3.5
ABHIJIT NATH
61W–61L career · 10 lines in 2022
40%60%<1%
3.03
Matthew Shepherd
20W–7L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%69%31%
2.94
Vasile Katsaros
5W–2L career · no lines in 2022
<1%77%23%
2.90
Robert Rosenau
63W–36L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
2.80
Kevin Doss
17W–5L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Lars Traner
19W–12L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Leif Christman
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Rajender Singh
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.