Teams

COLLIER /M.Young/55&Over6.0W

2025 Collier Adult 55 & Over ESL Fall · Adult 55 & Over 6.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.17 / REGION_7

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-12-06vs Heritage Bay - K.KeillorWon 10
W#1 DoublesPamela Ginzburg / Nina Savoca vs Linda Lynch / Kimberly Martin6-4, 7-6
2024-11-22vs Hammock Bay - CraneWon 10
W#1 DoublesMonique Berlinger / Pamela Ginzburg vs Jacquie Currie / Susan Gruber7-6, 6-3
2024-11-19vs Vineyards -Won 10
W#1 DoublesPamela Ginzburg / Carol Garrison vs Karen Fredrickson / Paula Davis6-3, 6-2
2024-11-15vs Eagle CreekWon 20
W#1 DoublesLisa Hayes / Monique Berlinger vs Kathleen Barger / Nancy Kurty6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesSusan Ward / Adrienne Woodward vs Lori Brooks / Ann Englert6-2, 6-1
2024-11-08vs Naples YMCA - TitmusLost 01
L#1 DoublesPamela Ginzburg / Janet Berg vs Nina Akel / Martha Scott2-6, 6-7
2024-11-01vs Hideaway Beach - T.MyersWon 10
W#2 DoublesPamela Ginzburg / Lisa Hayes vs Jamey Moore / Susan Withrow6-3, 6-2
2024-10-25vs Players Club - DuffyWon 10
W#1 DoublesPamela Ginzburg / Lisa Hayes vs Donna Dolan / Kristine Riecker6-1, 6-3
2024-10-18vs Fiddlers Creek - FarnhamLost 01
L#1 DoublesMonique Berlinger / Pamela Ginzburg vs Barbara Country / Vicky Ramuta4-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 55 & Over 6.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.83 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.28
Pamela Ginzburg
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
2.93
Monique Berlinger
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.79
Carol Garrison
published 3
2.72
Adrienne Woodward
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.43
Michelle Young
published
Jill Chamberlain
published
Lisa Hayes
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Lorraine Bigelow
published
Mary Horn
published
Nina Savoca
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Adrienne Woodward + Nina Savoca303 matchesnot enough data
Pamela Ginzburg + Lorraine Bigelow123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Pamela Ginzburg
98W–87L career · 10 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
Monique Berlinger
14W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%68%32%
2.93
3
Carol Garrison
37W–43L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Adrienne Woodward
7W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
Michelle Young
10W–24L career · no lines in 2025
70%30%<1%
2.43
Jill Chamberlain
11W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lisa Hayes
2W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Lorraine Bigelow
9W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Mary Horn
3W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Nina Savoca
10W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.