Teams

Eagle Creek

2025 Collier Adult 55 & Over ESL Fall · Adult 55 & Over 6.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_7

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-12-03vs Hideaway Beach - T.MyersLost 12
W#1 DoublesKathleen Barger / Nancy Kurty vs Nancy Liaboe / Megan Zimmerman7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAnn Englert / Lori Brooks vs Michele Pallone / Trish Zimbalatti1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesConnie Poirier / Susan Rafferty vs Claire Babrowski / Jamey Moore3-6, 5-7
2024-11-15vs COLLIER /M.Young/55&Over6.0WLost 02
L#1 DoublesKathleen Barger / Nancy Kurty vs Lisa Hayes / Monique Berlinger2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesLori Brooks / Ann Englert vs Susan Ward / Adrienne Woodward2-6, 1-6
2024-11-11vs Pelican Marsh - WhalenLost 01
L#2 DoublesAnn Englert / Vicki Cooper vs Suzan Cook / Maria Cortese6-7, 6-1, 0-1
2024-11-08vs Players Club - DuffyWon 21
W#1 DoublesMaria Oddy / Kathleen Barger vs Joan Hostnik / Maria LoMonaco4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAnn Englert / Sarah Preusker vs Gerrie Logan / Julie Pearson6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesConnie Poirier / Lili Gross vs Wally Ross / Suzanne Jeffries1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 55 & Over 6.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.78 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.04
Connie Poirier
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.01
Vicki Cooper
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.86
Sarah Preusker
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.80
Nancy Kurty
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.79
Lori Brooks
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.69
Annette Tuebner
published 3
2.69
Maria Oddy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.60
Susan Rafferty
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.54
Ann Englert
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Kathleen Barger
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lori Brooks + Connie Poirier6260% games+6.1% vs expected
Maria Oddy + Sarah Preusker4354% games+3.2% vs expected
Ann Englert + Annette Tuebner1426% gamesnot enough data
Ann Englert + Lori Brooks033 matchesnot enough data
Annette Tuebner + Lori Brooks213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Connie Poirier
18W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%40%60%
3.04
Vicki Cooper
28W–63L career · 1 line in 2025
46%54%<1%
3.01
Sarah Preusker
13W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
1%84%16%
2.86
Nancy Kurty
14W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
2.80
Lori Brooks
11W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.79
3
Annette Tuebner
5W–13L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
2.69
Maria Oddy
7W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
9%89%1%
2.69
Susan Rafferty
5W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
23%77%<1%
2.60
3
Ann Englert
6W–17L career · type A · 3 lines in 2025
39%61%<1%
2.54
Kathleen Barger
2W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.