Teams

Lean in Late Drop

2026 FALL Adult 18&Over AM · DAY

5 players · average NTRP 3.75 / CENTRAL ARIZONA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings1 teams · DAY
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Lean in Late Drop000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.54 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Denise Wolfe
published 4
3.77
Jacqueline Brauneis
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Catherine Mirick
published 4
3.32
Diane Long
published 3.5
3.14
Alison Hall
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Denise Wolfe + Jacqueline Brauneis8072% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Denise Wolfe
72W–28L career · no lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
3.92
Jacqueline Brauneis
102W–112L career · 9 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Catherine Mirick
23W–20L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Diane Long
37W–24L career · no lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Alison Hall
47W–95L career · no lines in 2026
16%83%<1%
3.14

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.