Teams

KY/LEX/Nakanishi/Baker

2025 USTA LEAGUE 40 & Over ADULT LEXINGTON · Women 4.0

15 players · average NTRP 3.75 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-03-04vs KY/LEX/MolinaWon 32
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Sanders / Ann Hays vs Cindy Bramble / Lori Brunner7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesIleana Contreras vs Hiroko Nakata6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMary Cole / Tammy Mitchell vs Billie Walters / Leslie Russ6-1, 7-5
L#3 DoublesMartha Martin / Bridgett Barton vs Katerina Molina / Julie Carlisle2-6, 1-6
W#4 DoublesEmily Diehl / Tami Neal vs Cristi Hundley / Whitney Byard6-2, 6-2
2025-02-26vs KY/LEX/Parrish MorrowLost 23
L#1 DoublesMary Cole / Tammy Mitchell vs Grace McGonigle / Lindsey Kretz4-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesPatti Stanton vs Lily Le0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesLola Baker / Ann Hays vs Camille Morrow / Katie Parrish0-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesLeslie Taylor / Pam Blackwell vs Erin Brester / Robyn Clifford6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#4 DoublesMartha Martin / Bridgett Barton vs Cynthia Yeiser / Emily Pernice7-6, 6-4
2025-01-26vs KY/LEX/MolinaLost 14
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Sanders / Ann Hays vs Mary Jouet / Billie Walters3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMelanie Kilpatrick vs Hiroko Nakata4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesIleana Contreras / Mary Cole vs Leslie Russ / Whitney Byard4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesBridgett Barton / Leslie Taylor vs Holly Hasler / Sarah Knight2-6, 6-7
L#4 DoublesPam Blackwell / Tammy Mitchell vs Melinda McClain / Doris Senters4-6, 3-6
2025-01-21vs KY/LEX/Parrish MorrowLost 23
W#1 DoublesTammy Mitchell / Mary Cole vs Jill Leckner / Teela Watts6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesPatti Stanton vs Lily Le0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesAnn Hays / Elizabeth Sanders vs Jordan Reeves / Erin Azbell6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesLola Baker / Leslie Taylor vs Jennifer Alexander / Robyn Clifford6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#4 DoublesTami Neal / Katherine Hornback vs Emily Pernice / Cynthia Yeiser5-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.76
Ileana Contreras
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.63
Melanie Kilpatrick
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.60
Ann Hays
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.56
Tammy Mitchell
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.52
Bridgett Barton
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.40
Emily Diehl
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
3.37
Pam Blackwell
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published
3.30
Ikuko Nakanishi
published
3.27
Mary Cole
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.23
Katherine Hornback
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
3.13
Mary Diggins
published
3.09
Martha Martin
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published
2.97
Patti Stanton
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Lola Baker
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Tami Neal
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tammy Mitchell + Mary Cole3448% games+4.0% vs expected
Martha Martin + Bridgett Barton314 matchesnot enough data
Mary Cole + Ann Hays134 matchesnot enough data
Lola Baker + Ikuko Nakanishi213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ileana Contreras
15W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%92%4%
3.76
Melanie Kilpatrick
9W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.63
4
Ann Hays
5W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.60
Tammy Mitchell
3W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.56
3.5
Bridgett Barton
16W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%46%54%
3.52
Emily Diehl
69W–33L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.40
Pam Blackwell
4W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
82%18%<1%
3.37
Ikuko Nakanishi
5W–5L career · no lines in 2025
92%8%<1%
3.30
Mary Cole
7W–14L career · 4 lines in 2025
95%5%<1%
3.27
Katherine Hornback
5W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Mary Diggins
9W–15L career · no lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.13
Martha Martin
9W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.09
Patti Stanton
9W–54L career · 2 lines in 2025
57%43%<1%
2.97
Lola Baker
6W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tami Neal
3W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.