Teams

Midwest/Oler/65&Over6.0M

2025 NEOTA Adult 65 & Over Summer · NEOTA A65&O 6.0 Men

13 players · average NTRP 3.17 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-08-09vs A65 6.0M TP FoxWon 20
W#1 DoublesJohn Lilly / Richard Forsyth vs Dennis Virdo / George Welsh7-6, 6-2
W#2 DoublesChuck Roman / Gary Zwick vs William Farr / William Fox6-4, 7-6
2025-08-02vs A65 6.0M PW LongoriaWon 20
W#1 DoublesCharles Lockert / Bob Halper vs Richard Lancaster / Ronald Longoria6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesChuck Roman / John Lilly vs Thomas Dake / Gary Montgomery6-3, 6-2
2025-07-19vs A65 6.0M TP FoxWon 30
W#1 DoublesRichard Forsyth / Gary Zwick vs Timothy Patterson / Robert Schneider6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMike Madden / Jonathan Sherwin vs Brian Moore / Dennis Virdo6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCharles Lockert / Mike Baird vs Arthur Busch / William Farr6-0, 6-1
2025-07-12vs A65 6.0M PW LongoriaWon 20
W#1 DoublesChuck Roman / Mike Baird vs Ronald Longoria / Richard Lancaster6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesPhilip Christman / Timothy Feller vs Gary Montgomery / Joe Sokolowski6-3, 6-3
2025-06-21vs A65 6.0M TP FoxWon 30
W#1 DoublesWilliam Oler / Tim Allard vs William Fox / Timothy Patterson6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesCharles Lockert / Mike Baird vs Randall Fairfax / Dennis Virdo6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesBob Halper / Gary Zwick vs Arthur Busch / William Farr6-0, 6-0
2025-06-14vs A65 6.0M PW LongoriaWon 21
W#1 DoublesJohn Lilly / Charles Lockert vs Richard Lancaster / MacK Thomas6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesChuck Roman / Gary Zwick vs Roland Ciaramitaro / Thomas Dake6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesPhilip Christman / Timothy Feller vs Charles Buschert / Summit Dukeman6-1, 7-5
2025-05-31vs A65 6.0M TP FoxWon 21
W#1 DoublesTim Allard / William Oler vs George Welsh / William Farr6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJohn Lilly / Richard Forsyth vs Timothy Patterson / Dennis Virdo6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesMike Madden / Jonathan Sherwin vs William Fox / Arthur Busch6-1, 3-6, 0-1
2025-05-17vs A65 6.0M PW LongoriaWon 30
W#1 DoublesWilliam Oler / Tim Allard vs Ronald Longoria / Richard Lancaster6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesTimothy Feller / Philip Christman vs Roland Ciaramitaro / MacK Thomas6-4, 7-6
W#3 DoublesJohn Lilly / Charles Lockert vs Joe Sokolowski / Gary Montgomery6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · NEOTA A65&O 6.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Midwest/Oler/65&Over6.0M802225114
2A65 6.0M PW Longoria3571735234
3A65 6.0M TP Fox1761837243

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.00 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.16
Chuck Roman
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3
3.06
Bob Halper
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.97
Charles Lockert
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
2.81
Jonathan Sherwin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Gary Zwick
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Jack Zilly
published
John Lilly
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
Mike Baird
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Mike Madden
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Philip Christman
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Tim Allard
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Timothy Feller
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
William Oler
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John Lilly + Tim Allard9161% gamesnot enough data
John Lilly + Charles Lockert3647% gamesnot enough data
Philip Christman + Gary Zwick224 matchesnot enough data
Philip Christman + Timothy Feller404 matchesnot enough data
Tim Allard + William Oler303 matchesnot enough data
Tim Allard + Charles Lockert213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Chuck Roman
96W–66L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%13%87%
3.16
3
Bob Halper
34W–29L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%34%66%
3.06
3.5
Charles Lockert
46W–37L career · 7 lines in 2025
59%41%<1%
2.97
Jonathan Sherwin
6W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%90%8%
2.81
Gary Zwick
32W–20L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jack Zilly
5W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
John Lilly
59W–19L career · 8 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mike Baird
43W–20L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mike Madden
7W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Philip Christman
43W–25L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tim Allard
64W–27L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Timothy Feller
11W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
William Oler
16W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.