Teams

Ace Kickers

2021 18&Over Mixed Combo · 7.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.80 / NEW JERSEY REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-01-15vs Rocking Combo 7.5Split 11
L#1 Mixed DoublesJennifer Desalvo / Kishore Chandrasekharan vs Maddy Savoy / Sunil Sah3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 Mixed DoublesAnnika Ahlstrom / Philip Lakritz vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2020-12-04Lost 01
L#1 Mixed DoublesKishore Chandrasekharan / Danielle Cawood vs Thomas Kim / Sophie Yoon3-6, 4-6
2020-11-07vs TroublemakerLost 01
L#1 Mixed DoublesFrank Trapani / Danielle Cawood vs Marijus Kuzavas / Ji Won Woo0-6, 5-7
2020-10-30vs Rocking Combo 7.5Won 20
W#1 Mixed DoublesPatricia Travers / Kishore Chandrasekharan vs Tanya Woolley / Govindaraj Balakrishnan4-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#2 Mixed DoublesAnnika Ahlstrom / Philip Lakritz vs Rajiv Rohilla / Jennifer Chang7-5, 6-3
2020-10-09vs Rocking Combo 7.5Won 10
W#3 Mixed DoublesDanielle Cawood / Kishore Chandrasekharan vs Jasjit Singh / Joanne Surick7-6, 6-3
2020-09-26vs TroublemakerLost 02
L#1 Mixed DoublesAnnika Ahlstrom / Philip Lakritz vs Michael Huh / Michelle Kim2-6, 5-7
L#2 Mixed DoublesKishore Chandrasekharan / Patricia Travers vs James Ong / Ji Won Woo1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Annika Ahlstrom
usually #1 Mixed Doubles 33%, also #2 Mixed Doubles 33% · published 4
3.66
Danielle Cawood
usually #1 Mixed Doubles 67%, also #3 Mixed Doubles 33% · published 4
3.63
Jennifer Desalvo
published
3.62
Analida Alexay
published 4
3.32
Clint Tomlinson
published 3.5
3.25
Kishore Chandrasekharan
usually #1 Mixed Doubles 60%, also #2 Mixed Doubles 20% · published
3.25
Todd Allievi
published
3.24
Sarah Crawford
published
3.20
Maribel Unanue
published 3.5
3.16
Matthew Crawford
published
Astrid Kaiser
published
Patricia Travers
published
Philip Lakritz
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Annika Ahlstrom
25W–37L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Danielle Cawood
45W–39L career · 3 lines in 2021
12%88%<1%
3.66
Jennifer Desalvo
9W–25L career · no lines in 2021
16%84%<1%
3.63
4
Analida Alexay
20W–21L career · no lines in 2021
17%83%<1%
3.62
3.5
Clint Tomlinson
192W–174L career · no lines in 2021
1%91%9%
3.32
Kishore Chandrasekharan
88W–100L career · 5 lines in 2021
2%95%3%
3.25
Todd Allievi
27W–25L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%2%
3.25
Sarah Crawford
6W–4L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%2%
3.24
3.5
Maribel Unanue
134W–88L career · no lines in 2021
6%93%1%
3.20
Matthew Crawford
4W–6L career · no lines in 2021
10%89%<1%
3.16
Astrid Kaiser
35W–54L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Patricia Travers
22W–44L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Philip Lakritz
1W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.