Teams

TTC - Holley

2026 Tuscaloosa USTA Adult Spring Weeknight 40&over · 3.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-05-13vs NRYC-40+ 3.5-ClaryWon 31
W#1 DoublesKatherine Garayanala / Meg Edwards vs Donna Terry / Ines de Urtubey1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesStanislava Chtarbanova vs Jill Rowley4-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesRobin Holley / Roberta Leach vs Deborah Swanquist / Lisa Atkins6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMelissa Jacobs / Tanya Kisner vs Marina Williams / Danielle Oliver6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2026-05-05vs NRYC-40+ 3.5-ClaryWon 21
W#1 DoublesLinda Burchfield / Allison Lehman vs DeDe Clary / Amy Jo Akins6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKatherine Garayanala / Meg Edwards vs Deborah Swanquist / Lisa Atkins6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesRobin Holley / Susan Filippini vs Jill Rowley / Marina Williams6-7, 4-6
2026-04-27vs NRYC-40+ 3.5-ClaryLost 13
L#1 DoublesRobin Holley / Ouida Boykin vs DeDe Clary / Lisa Atkins2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesRoberta Leach vs Amy Jo Akins6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesTanya Kisner / Linda Burchfield vs Jill Rowley / Brooklyn Thom5-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesKatherine Garayanala / Lois Strachan vs Donna Terry / Danielle Oliver6-3, 0-6, 1-0
2026-04-23vs NRYC-40+ 3.5-ClaryWon 31
W#1 DoublesRobin Holley / Roberta Leach vs Marina Williams / Danielle Oliver6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesStanislava Chtarbanova vs Jill Rowley7-5, 7-5
W#2 DoublesKatherine Garayanala / Allison Lehman vs Amy Jo Akins / Donna Terry6-2, 6-0
L#3 DoublesMelissa Jacobs / Ouida Boykin vs DeDe Clary / Margaret Sgarlata6-0, 5-7, 0-1
2026-04-15vs NRYC-40+ 3.5-ClarySplit 22
W#1 DoublesKatherine Garayanala / Allison Lehman vs Donna Terry / Lisa Atkins7-6, 6-3
L#1 SinglesJamie Pearson vs Margaret Sgarlata3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLois Strachan / Melissa Jacobs vs Ines de Urtubey / Deborah Swanquist6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesTanya Kisner / Linda Burchfield vs Jill Rowley / Brooklyn Thom6-1, 7-6
2026-04-07vs NRYC-40+ 3.5-ClaryLost 13
W#1 DoublesRobin Holley / Roberta Leach vs DeDe Clary / Amy Jo Akins0-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesLois Strachan vs Jill Rowley5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesTanya Kisner / Meg Edwards vs Marina Williams / Danielle Oliver6-7, 5-7
L#3 DoublesJamie Pearson / Ouida Boykin vs Ines de Urtubey / Lisa Atkins4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1TTC - Holley42121229240
2NRYC-40+ 3.5-Clary24121226233

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Katherine Garayanala
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.40
Allison Lehman
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.35
Roberta Leach
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.34
Jamie Pearson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.30
Robin Holley
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.30
Linda Burchfield
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.30
Ouida Boykin
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.27
Lois Strachan
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.10
Tanya Kisner
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.08
Susan Filippini
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.98
Meg Edwards
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.95
Stanislava Chtarbanova
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Robin Holley + Susan Filippini8360% games+3.2% vs expected
Robin Holley + Roberta Leach15954% games+3.0% vs expected
Ouida Boykin + Robin Holley4254% games−0.3% vs expected
Roberta Leach + Lois Strachan213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katherine Garayanala
29W–15L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
3.44
3.5
Allison Lehman
10W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
3.40
Roberta Leach
43W–29L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%87%12%
3.35
3.5
Jamie Pearson
20W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%89%10%
3.34
Robin Holley
56W–32L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.30
Linda Burchfield
4W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.30
Ouida Boykin
62W–36L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%1%99%
3.30
Lois Strachan
8W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.27
Tanya Kisner
8W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.10
Susan Filippini
22W–21L career · 1 line in 2026
26%74%<1%
3.08
Meg Edwards
4W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
58%42%<1%
2.98
Stanislava Chtarbanova
30W–23L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%66%34%
2.95

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.