Teams

TAG SILVER

2022 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - NOCO · WOMEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER - NOCO

13 players · average NTRP 3.29 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-06-03vs FCCC REDLost 05
L#1 DoublesAngela Ehrlich / Diane Marion vs Stephanie Kemp / Haley Hasler3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#1 SinglesChristy Mascarenas vs Holly K. Brown1-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesDebbie Rowe / Lanay Smallwood vs Stefanie Haines / Robyn Brady3-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesAmy Bowness vs Emma Clay4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesKristin Hayden / Elina Fresquez vs Karen Weller / Kim McConnellogue4-6, 4-6
2022-05-26vs LVTA PURPLEWon 32
L#1 DoublesTammy Morrow / Kristin Hayden vs Dawn Hagen / Debbie Hansen4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#1 SinglesBecky Buhler vs Aubrey Woodard6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesNatalie Morgan / Angela Ehrlich vs Dawn Petersen / Jaclin Elkins6-0, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 SinglesChristy Mascarenas vs Sammi Pekarek6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesLanay Smallwood / Elina Fresquez vs Nancy Pflughoeft / Elizabeth Smith2-6, 3-6
2022-05-12vs CSULost 13
L#1 DoublesDebbie Rowe / Tammy Morrow vs Falguni Gill / Janet Gugliotto4-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesChristy Mascarenas vs Alexandra DeBever0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesAmy Bowness / Becky Buhler vs Tricia Diehl / Gina Hastings6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesLanay Smallwood / Kristin Hayden vs Tracy Hutton / Alison Earnhart4-6, 0-6
2022-05-05vs HMTC TURQUOISEWon 32
W#1 DoublesDiane Marion / Angela Ehrlich vs Karen Johnson / Kalyn Wegher6-1, 7-6
W#1 SinglesChristy Mascarenas vs Ashlee Whitesell6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMarcy Sanger / Amy Bowness vs Mary Gabiola / Judy Stout2-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesBecky Buhler vs Amy Bona6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesDebbie Rowe / Kimberly Wagner vs Kathi Freemann / Michele MacHado4-6, 3-6
2022-04-28vs FCCC REDLost 14
L#1 DoublesTammy Morrow / Marcy Sanger vs Haley Hasler / Karen Preiss1-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesBecky Buhler vs Emma Clay6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKristin Hayden / Natalie Morgan vs Holly K. Brown / Kim McConnellogue6-1, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesChristy Mascarenas vs Kelli Barber7-5, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKimberly Wagner / Lanay Smallwood vs Robyn Brady / KARA JONES0-6, 1-6
2022-04-21vs LVTA PURPLELost 23
L#1 DoublesTammy Morrow / Marcy Sanger vs Dawn Hagen / Lesa Morrill-Hughes0-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesBecky Buhler vs Cathy Simon6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesKristin Hayden / Elina Fresquez vs Austin Johnson / Debbie Hansen1-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesAngela Ehrlich vs Sammi Pekarek7-5, 6-2
L#3 DoublesKimberly Wagner / Amy Bowness vs Dawn Petersen / Kim Jensen3-6, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.97 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Amy Bowness
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.22
Becky Buhler
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.17
Tammy Morrow
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.15
Diane Marion
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.15
Angela Ehrlich
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3.5
2.95
Natalie Morgan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.91
Christy Mascarenas
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 3
Debbie Rowe
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.69
Elina Fresquez
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.54
Marcy Sanger
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Kimberly Wagner
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kristin Hayden
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Lanay Smallwood
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Diane Marion + Angela Ehrlich7555% games+0.9% vs expected
Natalie Morgan + Diane Marion3443% games−6.7% vs expected
Kimberly Wagner + Becky Buhler134 matchesnot enough data
Amy Bowness + Becky Buhler314 matchesnot enough data
Tammy Morrow + Debbie Rowe033 matchesnot enough data
Tammy Morrow + Marcy Sanger033 matchesnot enough data
Elina Fresquez + Debbie Rowe123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Amy Bowness
8W–11L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Becky Buhler
39W–37L career · 5 lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.22
Tammy Morrow
3W–16L career · 4 lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Diane Marion
23W–25L career · 2 lines in 2022
12%87%<1%
3.15
3.5
Angela Ehrlich
42W–43L career · 4 lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.15
Natalie Morgan
5W–13L career · 2 lines in 2022
66%34%<1%
2.95
3
Christy Mascarenas
22W–18L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%75%24%
2.91
3
Debbie Rowe
4W–19L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Elina Fresquez
3W–20L career · 3 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
2.69
Marcy Sanger
5W–27L career · 3 lines in 2022
38%62%<1%
2.54
Kimberly Wagner
4W–25L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kristin Hayden
2W–10L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Lanay Smallwood
0W–6L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.