Teams

LVTA PURPLE

2022 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - NOCO · WOMEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER - NOCO

11 players · average NTRP 3.44 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-06-02vs HMTC TURQUOISEWon 40
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Smith / Austin Johnson vs Ashlee Whitesell / Kalyn Wegher7-6, 7-5
W#1 SinglesJaclin Elkins vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesLesa Morrill-Hughes / Kim Jensen vs Rona van Sickle / Kathi Freemann6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesChristina Whalen / Cathy Simon vs Karen Johnson / Mary Gabiola7-5, 1-6, 1-0
2022-05-26vs TAG SILVERLost 23
W#1 DoublesDawn Hagen / Debbie Hansen vs Tammy Morrow / Kristin Hayden6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAubrey Woodard vs Becky Buhler3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDawn Petersen / Jaclin Elkins vs Natalie Morgan / Angela Ehrlich0-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 SinglesSammi Pekarek vs Christy Mascarenas2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesNancy Pflughoeft / Elizabeth Smith vs Lanay Smallwood / Elina Fresquez6-2, 6-3
2022-05-19vs CSULost 14
L#1 DoublesDawn Petersen / Jaclin Elkins vs Celeste Blackburn / Anja Mau5-7, 2-6
L#1 SinglesAubrey Woodard vs Paige Kanatous1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesNancy Pflughoeft / Dawn Hagen vs Debora J Miller / Janet Gugliotto6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesSammi Pekarek vs Alison Halopoff1-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesKim Jensen / Austin Johnson vs Tracy Hutton / Tricia Diehl6-3, 6-1
2022-05-12vs FCCC REDWon 32
W#1 DoublesDawn Hagen / Lesa Morrill-Hughes vs Kelsey Nosler / Kaylyn Shelby6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJaclin Elkins vs Emma Clay6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDebbie Hansen / Austin Johnson vs Melissa Conlon / Tahni Clay3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 SinglesAubrey Woodard vs Kelli Barber0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKim Jensen / Cathy Simon vs Robyn Brady / KARA JONES7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2022-04-28vs HMTC TURQUOISESplit 22
W#1 DoublesJaclin Elkins / Dawn Petersen vs Karen Johnson / Mary Gabiola4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesNancy Pflughoeft / Austin Johnson vs Kathi Freemann / Michele MacHado1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 SinglesSammi Pekarek vs Ashlee Whitesell1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesChristina Whalen / Cathy Simon vs Rona van Sickle / Judy Stout6-7, 3-6
2022-04-21vs TAG SILVERWon 31
W#1 DoublesDawn Hagen / Lesa Morrill-Hughes vs Tammy Morrow / Marcy Sanger6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAustin Johnson / Debbie Hansen vs Kristin Hayden / Elina Fresquez6-1, 6-4
L#2 SinglesSammi Pekarek vs Angela Ehrlich5-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesDawn Petersen / Kim Jensen vs Kimberly Wagner / Amy Bowness3-6, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.34
Debbie Hansen
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.31
Kim Jensen
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Dawn Hagen
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.20
Jaclin Elkins
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3.5
3.20
Lesa Morrill-Hughes
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.06
Austin Johnson
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.02
Aubrey Woodard
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
2.95
Nancy Pflughoeft
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.87
Dawn Petersen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
Christina Whalen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Sammi Pekarek
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Debbie Hansen + Nancy Pflughoeft7457% games+4.5% vs expected
Dawn Petersen + Lesa Morrill-Hughes3450% games+4.2% vs expected
Lesa Morrill-Hughes + Dawn Hagen20857% games+4.0% vs expected
Austin Johnson + Jaclin Elkins6448% games+2.2% vs expected
Lesa Morrill-Hughes + Jaclin Elkins5350% games+1.3% vs expected
Dawn Petersen + Jaclin Elkins111245% games−1.3% vs expected
Austin Johnson + Lesa Morrill-Hughes4947% games−2.4% vs expected
Austin Johnson + Debbie Hansen4347% games−6.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Debbie Hansen
51W–45L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
3.34
Kim Jensen
35W–30L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%92%8%
3.31
3.5
Dawn Hagen
43W–35L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Jaclin Elkins
63W–60L career · 5 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Lesa Morrill-Hughes
83W–71L career · 3 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Austin Johnson
41W–60L career · 5 lines in 2022
33%67%<1%
3.06
3.5
Aubrey Woodard
10W–22L career · 3 lines in 2022
44%56%<1%
3.02
3.5
Nancy Pflughoeft
60W–97L career · 3 lines in 2022
65%35%<1%
2.95
3
Dawn Petersen
70W–102L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%83%16%
2.87
Christina Whalen
5W–11L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Sammi Pekarek
0W–5L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.