Teams

SLlewellyn-ENO

2025 Eno River Singles 18 & Over · 18 & Over Singles 4.5 Men Evening

8 players · average NTRP 4.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-06-25vs JLundberg-ENOWon 10
W#2 SinglesSpencer Llewellyn vs Joshua Lundberg6-1, 6-1
2025-06-23vs SBenson-CHTCWon 10
W#3 SinglesSpencer Llewellyn vs Scott Benson7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2025-06-19vs MHanauer-ENOLost 02
L#2 SinglesRyan Sayko vs Daniel Martchek5-7, 6-7
L#3 SinglesMatthew James vs Jeron Russell1-6, 1-6
2025-06-04vs JClough-DFCWon 20
W#2 SinglesSpencer Llewellyn vs Edmund Malesky6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesMatthew James vs Edward Anderson6-2, 6-4
2025-06-03vs MHanauer-ENOWon 10
W#3 SinglesMatthew James vs Jackson Cabell6-1, 6-2
2025-06-01vs JLundberg-ENOSplit 11
W#1 SinglesRyan Sayko vs Luc Sanchez7-5, 6-1
L#2 SinglesSpencer Llewellyn vs Michael Weslander6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2025-05-07vs SBenson-CHTCLost 01
L#2 SinglesRyan Sayko vs Casey Black2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Singles 4.5 Men Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.31 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.69
John Hankinson
published
4.46
Parv Mital
published
4.33
Tyler Carroll
published
4.27
Spencer Llewellyn
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #3 Singles 25% · published 4.5
4.24
Matthew James
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 4.5
4.24
Kelvin Menezes
published
4.14
Ryan Sayko
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4.5
4.11
Daniel Gallo
published 4.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ryan Sayko + Spencer Llewellyn224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

John Hankinson
28W–9L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.69
Parv Mital
26W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%62%38%
4.46
Tyler Carroll
22W–21L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
4.33
4.5
Spencer Llewellyn
230W–157L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
4.27
4.5
Matthew James
67W–60L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
4.24
Kelvin Menezes
13W–6L career · no lines in 2025
4%92%3%
4.24
4.5
Ryan Sayko
78W–106L career · 3 lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
4.14
4.5
Daniel Gallo
4W–9L career · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
4.11

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.