Teams

Penn Pals

2025 USTA ADULT 55 and OVER - BOISE · TV

13 players · average NTRP 3.82 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-07-01vs Sister SqadLost 02
L#1 DoublesDebbie Merritt / Barbara Beagles vs Kayce McEwan / Christina Peterman4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesAlaine Blaser / Wendy Anderson vs Lisa Diehr / Becky Caven2-6, 2-6
2025-06-05vs Sister SqadWon 20
W#1 DoublesAlaine Blaser / Brette Shakespeare vs Elizabeth Blackwell / Karen Mangum6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMichelle Meyers / Heidi Stipp vs Terry Hardy / Mary Parsons6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for TV have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.52 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.00
Debbie Merritt
published 4
3.75
Alaine Blaser
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.72
Amy Steckel
published 4
3.70
3.66
Suzanne Baran
published 4
3.57
Heidi Stipp
published 4
3.50
Cindy Duncan
published 4
3.34
Bonnie Stotland
published 3.5
3.32
Cathy Adams
published 3.5
3.15
Barbara Beagles
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.99
Barb Harper
published 3.5
Marianne Geier
published
Michelle Meyers
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cathy Adams + Bonnie Stotland4456% games+15.5% vs expected
Heidi Stipp + Debbie Merritt4360% games+10.4% vs expected
Alaine Blaser + Brette Shakespeare4654% games+2.6% vs expected
Amy Steckel + Suzanne Baran7258% games+1.1% vs expected
Amy Steckel + Brette Shakespeare4357% games−0.5% vs expected
Cindy Duncan + Michelle Meyers7455% gamesnot enough data
Barb Harper + Suzanne Baran2848% gamesnot enough data
Barbara Beagles + Heidi Stipp8065% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Debbie Merritt
205W–117L career · no lines in 2025
<1%50%50%
4.00
4
Alaine Blaser
20W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.75
4
Amy Steckel
116W–122L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Brette Shakespeare
77W–72L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.70
4
Suzanne Baran
212W–163L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.66
4
Heidi Stipp
166W–108L career · no lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.57
4
Cindy Duncan
17W–23L career · no lines in 2025
50%50%<1%
3.50
3.5
Bonnie Stotland
44W–44L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%13%
3.34
3.5
Cathy Adams
72W–63L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Barbara Beagles
34W–51L career · 1 line in 2025
15%85%1%
3.15
3.5
Barb Harper
8W–25L career · no lines in 2025
54%46%<1%
2.99
Marianne Geier
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Michelle Meyers
18W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.