Teams

CDTA S 55&OW8.0 1.NTC Tenuta Thu 7 $24

1Summer 55&O WN · WE

18 players · average NTRP 3.90 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
L#3 DoublesColleen Stover / Margaret McAndrews vs Kelly O'Donnell / Diane McKillen6-4, 1-4
L#1 DoublesKaren Avery / Mary Sullivan vs Elizabeth Bowker / Anne Zanella-Gleason1-6, 2-6
W#1 DoublesKaren Avery / Kelly Tenuta vs Nancy Manolis / Rochelle Meng6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesColleen Stover / Cynthia McCarthy vs Ann Murtaugh / Tracy Richards4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · WE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA S 55&OW8.0 7.STP Pirron Mon 7 $22701838115
2CDTA S 55&OW8.0 3.STP Eisner Sun 10 $226113817161
3CDTA S 55&OW8.0 4.Tam Corey Sun 1 $224314717160
4CDTA S 55&OW8.0 2.Nielsen Ueda Sun 1 $223491227188
5CDTA S 55&OW8.0 5.STP ODonnell Thu 7 $223481329207
6CDTA S 55&OW8.0 1.NTC Tenuta Thu 7 $2425101126183
7CDTA S 55&OW8.0 6.CC Carvell Sun 10 $222571429197
8CDTA S 55&OW8.0 8.OakP(OUT) Roberts Sun 2 $201651634220

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.52 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.95
Colleen Stover
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.80
Cindy MacDonald
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.68
3.67
Wendy Leto
published 4
3.65
Debbie Skowron
published 4
3.63
Mary Sullivan
published 4
3.62
Kristie Traverso
published 4
3.60
Dorothy OMalley
published 4
3.56
Kerri Sedlacek
published 4
3.50
Martha Skryd
published 4
3.47
Kelly Tenuta
published 4
3.38
Janine Stalcup
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.36
Margaret McAndrews
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published
3.28
Patricia Stifter
published 3.5
3.27
Cynthia McCarthy
published 3.5
3.24
Karin Carney
published 3.5
3.20
Tece Hendrickson
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Karen Avery
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristie Traverso + Cynthia McCarthy8262% games+13.2% vs expected
Kerri Sedlacek + Mary Sullivan21044% games+6.0% vs expected
Cindy MacDonald + Catherine Wasylenko4357% games+5.5% vs expected
Dorothy OMalley + Martha Skryd8851% games+3.0% vs expected
Kerri Sedlacek + Karin Carney15556% games+2.8% vs expected
Dorothy OMalley + Mary Sullivan2440% games+1.8% vs expected
Kristie Traverso + Patricia Stifter10557% games−2.7% vs expected
Kelly Tenuta + Kerri Sedlacek7654% games−8.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Colleen Stover
89W–46L career · 2 lines in 2026
65%35%<1%
3.95
4
Cindy MacDonald
74W–52L career · 1 line in 2026
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Catherine Wasylenko
102W–88L career · no lines in 2026
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Wendy Leto
109W–80L career · no lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.67
4
Debbie Skowron
64W–54L career · no lines in 2026
12%88%<1%
3.65
4
Mary Sullivan
47W–59L career · no lines in 2026
15%84%<1%
3.63
4
Kristie Traverso
46W–38L career · no lines in 2026
18%81%<1%
3.62
4
Dorothy OMalley
173W–204L career · no lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.60
4
Kerri Sedlacek
99W–73L career · no lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
3.56
4
Martha Skryd
87W–123L career · no lines in 2026
50%50%<1%
3.50
4
Kelly Tenuta
90W–94L career · no lines in 2026
60%40%<1%
3.47
3.5
Janine Stalcup
86W–59L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.38
Margaret McAndrews
75W–66L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%85%14%
3.36
3.5
Patricia Stifter
31W–19L career · no lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.28
3.5
Cynthia McCarthy
76W–75L career · no lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Karin Carney
126W–103L career · no lines in 2026
3%94%2%
3.24
Tece Hendrickson
42W–29L career · 5 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.20
Karen Avery
11W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.