Teams

CDTA S 55&OW8.0 4.Tam Corey Sun 1 $22

1Summer 55&O WN · WE

18 players · average NTRP 4.00 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
W#1 DoublesTracy Richards / Ann Murtaugh vs Rebecca Daly / Martha Lloyd6-1, 6-3
W#1 DoublesMolly Shapiro / Desiree Witte vs Debra Brambora / Anne Zanella-Gleason6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAnnette Hennessy / Tracy Richards vs Elizabeth Bowker / Conni Stinek7-6, 2-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesNancy Manolis / Laura Purcell vs Susan Ellison / Terri Whiting3-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesAnn Murtaugh / Tracy Richards vs Carol Marselle / Katrin Maldre7-5, 5-2
W#1 DoublesAnn Murtaugh / Tracy Richards vs Raquel Karpinski / Lara Phillips6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesRochelle Meng / Laura Purcell vs Mya Murata / Irene Powers6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLing Arenson / Elizabeth Quigley vs Youngran Chung / Erin Wyatt6-2, 6-4
2026-06-07Won 10
W#1 DoublesLaura Purcell / Ann Murtaugh vs Roberta Louis Goodman / Noreen Ohcana6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAnn Murtaugh / Tracy Richards vs Colleen Stover / Cynthia McCarthy6-4, 6-1
2026-05-17Won 10
W#3 DoublesMolly Shapiro / Rochelle Meng vs Patricia Nelson / Cindy Sullivan0-6, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · WE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA S 55&OW8.0 7.STP Pirron Mon 7 $22701838115
2CDTA S 55&OW8.0 3.STP Eisner Sun 10 $226113817161
3CDTA S 55&OW8.0 4.Tam Corey Sun 1 $224314717160
4CDTA S 55&OW8.0 2.Nielsen Ueda Sun 1 $223491227188
5CDTA S 55&OW8.0 5.STP ODonnell Thu 7 $223481329207
6CDTA S 55&OW8.0 1.NTC Tenuta Thu 7 $2425101126183
7CDTA S 55&OW8.0 6.CC Carvell Sun 10 $222571429197
8CDTA S 55&OW8.0 8.OakP(OUT) Roberts Sun 2 $201651634220

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.75 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.36
Jennifer Goldfarb
published
4.14
Jennifer Langtry
published 4.5
3.99
Soraya McTeague
published 4.5
3.96
Desiree Witte
published 4
3.92
Cara Waddle
published 4
3.87
Tracy Richards
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.74
Molly Shapiro
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.74
Annette Hennessy
published 4
3.73
Ann Murtaugh
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.71
Elizabeth Quigley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.67
Laura Purcell
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.61
Julie Weidner
published
3.60
Maura Starshak
published 4
3.60
Rochelle Meng
published 4
3.60
Ling Arenson
published 4
3.56
Nancy Manolis
published 4
3.46
Maria Lobo-Corey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.31
Rosemary Swierk
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tracy Richards + Jennifer Langtry5260% games+15.6% vs expected
Molly Shapiro + Desiree Witte5158% games+9.2% vs expected
Tracy Richards + Ann Murtaugh7458% games+7.7% vs expected
Maria Lobo-Corey + Nancy Manolis9360% games+4.5% vs expected
Ling Arenson + Julie Weidner12851% games+3.5% vs expected
Maria Lobo-Corey + Julie Weidner193049% games+1.4% vs expected
Cara Waddle + Desiree Witte443453% games+0.2% vs expected
Jennifer Langtry + Ann Murtaugh3254% games−0.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Goldfarb
61W–19L career · no lines in 2026
1%84%16%
4.36
4.5
Jennifer Langtry
244W–109L career · no lines in 2026
16%84%1%
4.14
4.5
Soraya McTeague
162W–103L career · no lines in 2026
54%46%<1%
3.99
4
Desiree Witte
254W–183L career · no lines in 2026
<1%60%40%
3.96
4
Cara Waddle
150W–116L career · no lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
3.92
Tracy Richards
113W–48L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.87
Molly Shapiro
49W–36L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%92%3%
3.74
4
Annette Hennessy
150W–161L career · no lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.74
4
Ann Murtaugh
137W–81L career · 5 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.73
Elizabeth Quigley
90W–60L career · 1 line in 2026
7%91%2%
3.71
Laura Purcell
152W–152L career · 3 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.67
Julie Weidner
146W–137L career · no lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.61
4
Maura Starshak
85W–44L career · no lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
3.60
4
Rochelle Meng
178W–190L career · no lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
3.60
4
Ling Arenson
54W–44L career · no lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
3.60
4
Nancy Manolis
114W–130L career · no lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
3.56
3.5
Maria Lobo-Corey
265W–225L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%60%40%
3.46
3.5
Rosemary Swierk
70W–29L career · no lines in 2026
1%90%8%
3.31

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.