Teams

Powell- NC- Oxford

2025 Mixed 40&Over-NC · 4.0 Mixed

11 players · average NTRP 3.75 / MISSISSIPPI

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-07-20vs Marley - Delta - ClevelandLost 02
L#1 DoublesRamey Hardin / Logan Power vs Jeff Hardin / Caitlin Thomas4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesBrent Powell / Layla Kiffin vs Mark Hardin / Christy Prine3-6, 3-6
2025-07-17vs Fowler/McCrory - NC -SouthavenLost 03
L#1 DoublesBrent Powell / Paige Campbell vs Tracy Duff / Darshan Sampat2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesVicki Ferguson / Josh Whelan vs Claire Fowler / Matthew Gregg1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJennifer Magee / John Heard vs Kristi McCrory / Joe Johnson4-6, 4-6
2025-07-08vs Fowler/McCrory - NC -SouthavenLost 03
L#1 DoublesBrent Powell / Paige Campbell vs Andre George II / Kristi McCrory4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJohn Heard / Jennifer Magee vs Darshan Sampat / Tracy Duff6-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesVicki Ferguson / Josh Whelan vs Claire Fowler / Matthew Gregg0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.56
Layla Kiffin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.54
Brent Powell
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.40
John Heard
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.34
Jay Knight
published
3.27
Paige Campbell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.20
Missie Knight
published
2.99
Celia Wood
published 3.5
2.92
Ramey Hardin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.66
Vicki Ferguson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Josh Whelan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Logan Power
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Missie Knight + Jay Knight4253% games−3.9% vs expected
Logan Power + Ramey Hardin213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Layla Kiffin
4W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.56
4
Brent Powell
2W–16L career · type S · 3 lines in 2025
39%61%<1%
3.54
John Heard
13W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%76%23%
3.40
Jay Knight
19W–16L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%13%
3.34
Paige Campbell
2W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
95%5%<1%
3.27
Missie Knight
12W–13L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Celia Wood
17W–30L career · no lines in 2025
52%48%<1%
2.99
Ramey Hardin
22W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
0%<1%>99%
2.92
Vicki Ferguson
5W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
13%86%1%
2.66
Josh Whelan
0W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Logan Power
2W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.