Teams

SFV LLW Swingin Singles-Baker-Paseo Club

2025 Team Singles 18 SFV Fall · SFV 18+ Women 3.0 Singles

11 players · average NTRP 3.17 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-12-14vs SFV PPB Singles-Chu-CSUNSplit 11
L#1 SinglesDana Marterella vs Desire Stephens3-6, 6-7
W#2 SinglesJennifer Orwin vs Christine Chu6-1, 6-1
2025-12-13vs SFV Love All-Bowen-Toluca LakeWon 30
W#1 SinglesJennifer Orwin vs Anna Bowen6-1, 6-1
W#2 SinglesGinny Than vs Heather Flanders6-4, 6-3
W#3 SinglesFrederique Salomon vs Melissa Turai6-2, 7-6
W#1 SinglesFrederique Salomon vs Michelle Sarraf6-2, 6-4
W#2 SinglesDana Marterella vs Elke Dobrowoslki6-0, 6-0
L#3 SinglesLourdes Price vs Denise Harris2-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SFV 18+ Women 3.0 Singles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.00 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Marah Hogendorn
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.18
Salisa Wagner
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.16
Jennifer Orwin
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
3.08
Melanie Delgado
published
3.06
Janine Baker
published
2.96
Ginny Than
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3
2.85
Hanan Asfoury
published 3
2.84
Dana Marterella
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
2.79
Megan St Marie
published
2.66
Frederique Salomon
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 3
Lourdes Price
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Marah Hogendorn
39W–15L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.42
3.5
Salisa Wagner
66W–62L career · 4 lines in 2025
8%91%1%
3.18
Jennifer Orwin
32W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%11%89%
3.16
Melanie Delgado
18W–23L career · no lines in 2025
<1%28%72%
3.08
Janine Baker
10W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%31%69%
3.06
3
Ginny Than
4W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%63%37%
2.96
3
Hanan Asfoury
11W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%87%13%
2.85
3
Dana Marterella
6W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%88%11%
2.84
Megan St Marie
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%94%5%
2.79
3
Frederique Salomon
11W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
11%88%<1%
2.66
Lourdes Price
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.