Teams

SFV Baseline Baddies-Malhotra-Balboa/VNSO

2025 Team Singles 18 SFV Fall · SFV 18+ Women 3.0 Singles

16 players · average NTRP 2.86 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-12-06vs SFV Shot Girls-Alcantar-CSUNWon 20
W#2 SinglesTressa M Dhiab vs Tatiana Chilcovsky3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 SinglesElke Dobrowoslki vs Simone Walker6-2, 6-3
2025-11-23vs SFV Ace High-Kim-Scholl/KimWon 21
W#1 SinglesRoopika Malhotra vs Emily Pai5-7, 6-5, 1-0
L#2 SinglesCaitlin Stacy vs Penny Zhang3-6, 1-6
W#3 SinglesMichelle Sarraf vs Sara Israel3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-11-09vs SFV-Spin-Offs 3.0-Tesoro-CSUNLost 12
L#1 SinglesCindy Emanuel vs Amy Chozick2-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesTressa M Dhiab vs Angie Wu6-3, 6-4
L#3 SinglesRona Steinberg vs Wendy Magdlen3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-11-02vs SFV PPB Singles-Chu-CSUNLost 02
L#1 SinglesDenise Harris vs Sara Lee0-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesElke Dobrowoslki vs Desire Stephens0-6, 1-6
2025-10-26vs SFV Ace Queens-Ortiz-CSUNLost 12
L#1 SinglesJacquelynn Hansen vs Tracy Leiterman4-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesCaitlin Stacy vs Martha Iveth Zarate1-6, 5-7
W#3 SinglesRona Steinberg vs Joann Buckley Collins7-5, 2-6, 1-0
2025-10-19vs SFV Great Shots-Ho-Scholl/TBDWon 21
W#1 SinglesNas Cohen vs Cynthia Su6-0, 6-1
L#2 SinglesMichelle Sarraf vs Sonia Chan1-6, 0-6
W#3 SinglesSally Triphon vs Yena Hong6-2, 6-3
2025-10-05vs SFV Talmadge-ElCaballeroWon 30
W#1 SinglesJacquelynn Hansen vs Hannah Nasseri6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesGabriela Ioana Bernacchi vs Carolina Ciappa6-2, 6-2
W#3 SinglesCindy Emanuel vs Rebecca Kogen6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesRoopika Malhotra vs Ashley Bol6-2, 6-1
W#2 SinglesNas Cohen vs En Jang6-1, 6-1
W#3 SinglesCaitlin Stacy vs Liyan Wang2-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-09-14vs SFV Love All-Bowen-Toluca LakeSplit 11
W#1 SinglesJacquelynn Hansen vs Ann Garrett5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 SinglesDenise Harris vs Charissa Smith6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesMichelle Sarraf vs Frederique Salomon2-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesElke Dobrowoslki vs Dana Marterella0-6, 0-6
W#3 SinglesDenise Harris vs Lourdes Price2-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SFV 18+ Women 3.0 Singles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.75 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.23
Nas Cohen
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.14
Roopika Malhotra
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.09
Sally Triphon
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
2.99
Jacquelynn Hansen
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.90
Bethany Nelson
published 3
2.90
Tressa M Dhiab
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.82
Jodi Chall
published 3
Christine Benda
published 3
2.54
Michelle Sarraf
usually #3 Singles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.53
Cindy Emanuel
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 3
2.49
Caitlin Stacy
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3
2.42
Denise Harris
usually #3 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 2.5
2.35
Elke Dobrowoslki
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
2.34
Rona Steinberg
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Alexandra Kondracke
published 2.5
Gabriela Ioana Bernacchi
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jodi Chall + Bethany Nelson7456% games+7.4% vs expected
Cindy Emanuel + Gabriela Ioana Bernacchi4448% gamesnot enough data
Sally Triphon + Nas Cohen213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nas Cohen
10W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Roopika Malhotra
10W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
3.14
Sally Triphon
4W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.09
Jacquelynn Hansen
7W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%54%46%
2.99
3
Bethany Nelson
19W–17L career · no lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
2.90
Tressa M Dhiab
10W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
2.90
3
Jodi Chall
43W–56L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Christine Benda
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Michelle Sarraf
12W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
38%61%<1%
2.54
3
Cindy Emanuel
17W–29L career · 2 lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
2.53
3
Caitlin Stacy
10W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
53%47%<1%
2.49
2.5
Denise Harris
6W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%72%28%
2.42
Elke Dobrowoslki
10W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%86%14%
2.35
Rona Steinberg
15W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%87%13%
2.34
2.5
Alexandra Kondracke
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Gabriela Ioana Bernacchi
5W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.