Teams

SFV Ace Queens-Ortiz-CSUN

2025 Team Singles 18 SFV Fall · SFV 18+ Women 3.0 Singles

9 players · average NTRP 3.25 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-12-07vs SFV Love All-Bowen-Toluca LakeWon 21
L#1 SinglesTracy Leiterman vs Alicia Harris6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesJudith Ortiz vs Charissa Smith6-3, 0-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesJoann Buckley Collins vs Melissa Turai6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesTracy Leiterman vs Jacquelynn Hansen6-4, 6-1
W#2 SinglesMartha Iveth Zarate vs Caitlin Stacy6-1, 7-5
L#3 SinglesJoann Buckley Collins vs Rona Steinberg5-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#1 SinglesJennifer Sung vs Tia Ayers1-6, 1-3
W#2 SinglesTracy Leiterman vs ANALILY PARK6-1, 6-4
L#3 SinglesJoann Buckley Collins vs Ashley Bol3-6, 4-6
2025-09-28vs SFV Ace High-Kim-Scholl/KimLost 12
L#1 SinglesTracy Leiterman vs Penny Zhang6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 SinglesVeronica Cerna vs Tessa Kier0-6, 0-6
W#3 SinglesJudith Ortiz vs Jane Shin6-1, 6-3
2025-09-14vs SFV Talmadge-ElCaballeroWon 30
W#1 SinglesJudith Ortiz vs Alik Apelian6-1, 6-1
W#2 SinglesGrace Gillham vs Ashley Kaufman6-1, 7-5
W#3 SinglesTracy Leiterman vs Carolina Ciappa6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SFV 18+ Women 3.0 Singles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.94 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.17
Jennifer Sung
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.12
Sheba ZamanZadeh
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3
3.07
Danielle Demianczyk
published 3.5
3.00
Tracy Leiterman
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #3 Singles 20% · published
2.88
Martha Iveth Zarate
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.84
Judith Ortiz
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.48
Grace Gillham
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Joann Buckley Collins
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Veronica Cerna
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Sung
19W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
3
Sheba ZamanZadeh
76W–54L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%20%80%
3.12
3.5
Danielle Demianczyk
9W–6L career · no lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.07
Tracy Leiterman
22W–18L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
3.00
Martha Iveth Zarate
3W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%80%20%
2.88
Judith Ortiz
14W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
2.84
Grace Gillham
5W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
0%57%43%
2.48
Joann Buckley Collins
5W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Veronica Cerna
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.