Teams

SFV Talmadge-ElCaballero

2025 Team Singles 18 SFV Fall · SFV 18+ Women 3.0 Singles

6 players · average NTRP 2.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-12-07vs SFV-Spin-Offs 3.0-Tesoro-CSUNLost 02
L#1 SinglesAlik Apelian vs Cecilia Lam1-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesRebecca Kogen vs Tisha San Miguel1-6, 1-6
2025-11-02vs SFV Great Shots-Ho-Scholl/TBDLost 03
L#1 SinglesNatalie Coffen vs Emily Park6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesAlik Apelian vs Jin Kim0-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesCarolina Ciappa vs Yena Hong6-7, 6-2, 0-1
2025-11-01vs SFV Ace High-Kim-Scholl/KimLost 12
L#1 SinglesHannah Nasseri vs Emily Pai0-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesAlik Apelian vs Sara Israel6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 SinglesAshley Kaufman vs Tessa Kier4-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesAlik Apelian vs Diana Galaviz1-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesNatalie Coffen vs Vanessa Nelson6-1, 6-1
L#3 SinglesRebecca Kogen vs Norma Jean0-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesHannah Nasseri vs Jacquelynn Hansen0-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesCarolina Ciappa vs Gabriela Ioana Bernacchi2-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesRebecca Kogen vs Cindy Emanuel1-6, 1-6
2025-09-28vs SFV Shot Girls-Alcantar-CSUNLost 12
W#1 SinglesNatalie Coffen vs Selena Montania6-2, 6-2
L#2 SinglesAshley Kaufman vs Alexis Alcantar6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 SinglesRebecca Kogen vs Nereida Carrillo4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2025-09-14vs SFV Ace Queens-Ortiz-CSUNLost 03
L#1 SinglesAlik Apelian vs Judith Ortiz1-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesAshley Kaufman vs Grace Gillham1-6, 5-7
L#3 SinglesCarolina Ciappa vs Tracy Leiterman1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SFV 18+ Women 3.0 Singles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.42 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.42
Ashley Kaufman
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 2.5
Alik Apelian
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 2.5
Carolina Ciappa
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 2.5
Hannah Nasseri
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 2.5
Natalie Coffen
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Rebecca Kogen
usually #3 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Ashley Kaufman
1W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%72%28%
2.42
2.5
Alik Apelian
1W–4L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Carolina Ciappa
2W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Hannah Nasseri
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Natalie Coffen
2W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rebecca Kogen
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.