Teams

LKHaynes/Westport 40s 4.0 Wed

2022 Lake USTA 40 & Over League · Men 4.0

9 players · average NTRP 4.10 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-04-20vs LJLA-Lands/CSDWon 10
W#1 DoublesKevin Hawkins / Ronn Price vs Craig Hughes / Jonathan Hole6-4, 6-1
2022-04-14vs LJDoyle40/NMPWon 10
W#3 DoublesRonn Price / Chip Ashley vs Kalpathi Subramanian / Robert Bunting6-3, 6-2
2022-04-06Won 10
W#1 DoublesCorey Cornacchio / Kevin Hawkins vs William Schirmer / Scott Reynolds6-4, 7-5
2022-03-30vs LDBaker/NMP 40s 4.0Lost 01
L#3 DoublesKevin Hawkins / Corey Cornacchio vs David Boone / Nate Roller2-6, 1-6
2022-03-26vs LDHeicken/PACWon 20
W#1 DoublesCorey Cornacchio / Kevin Hawkins vs Jeff Lloyd / George Harris6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesRonn Price / Chip Ashley vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-03-19vs LGHaislip/TrumpWon 10
W#1 DoublesBrad Mettee / Kevin Hawkins vs Brandon Sheets / Wayne Seay6-4, 6-3
2022-03-02Won 10
W#3 DoublesKevin Hawkins / John Weber vs Andrew Giles / JaMarr Funderburg6-3, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.70 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Charlie King
published 4.5
3.94
Kevin Hawkins
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.87
Corey Cornacchio
published 4
3.81
Thomas Andrews
published
3.66
Chip Ashley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.49
Edward Bugg
published 4
3.42
John Weber
published
Jay Deaver
published
Karl Painter
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kevin Hawkins + Chip Ashley6065% gamesnot enough data
John Weber + Edward Bugg123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Charlie King
4W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Kevin Hawkins
119W–56L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%68%32%
3.94
4
Corey Cornacchio
13W–3L career · no lines in 2022
<1%84%15%
3.87
Thomas Andrews
12W–5L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%8%
3.81
4
Chip Ashley
127W–132L career · 2 lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
3.66
4
Edward Bugg
4W–7L career · no lines in 2022
52%48%<1%
3.49
John Weber
18W–7L career · no lines in 2022
<1%72%28%
3.42
Jay Deaver
2W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Karl Painter
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.