Teams

KSouthern

2022 Cap Spring USTA 40 & over · 3.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-05-17vs DSelf 3.0 40+Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLisa Freeman / Karen Southern vs Jill Salstrand / Deborah Self1-6, 5-7
2022-05-10vs TSchoenSplit 11
W#2 DoublesKaren Southern / Lisa Freeman vs Kate Pirrung / Cathy Werder6-2, 7-6
L#3 DoublesLinda Mildwurf / Cosette Philpot vs Tori Schoen / Amanda Viele3-6, 3-6
2022-04-26vs APershkeSplit 11
W#2 DoublesLisa Freeman / Karen Southern vs Josie Tattersall / Kari Knoblauch7-5, 6-1
L#3 DoublesCosette Philpot / Elizabeth Vandecarr vs Mary Elizabeth Phillips / Katherine Rostick6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2022-04-19vs SSIKESWon 20
W#1 DoublesDebra Hauge / Lisa Freeman vs Judy Colby / Jennifer Mitchell7-6, 6-2
W#3 DoublesCosette Philpot / Linda Mildwurf vs Jennifer Diehl / Christine Rosin6-2, 6-3
2022-04-05Won 10
W#1 SinglesDebra Hauge vs Carla Gorman6-1, 6-0
2022-03-29vs TSchoenLost 01
L#1 DoublesNora Stacey / Karen Southern vs Emma Coblentz / Kate Pirrung3-6, 3-6
2022-03-15vs APershkeWon 10
W#3 DoublesSuzy Kaelin / Cosette Philpot vs Mary Elizabeth Phillips / Ellen Nespeca6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2022-03-08vs SSIKESWon 20
W#1 DoublesDebra Hauge / Genny Igo vs Judy Colby / Mary Strothmann7-6, 0-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKaren Southern vs Christine Mccorquodale6-3, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.68 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.89
Melissa George
published
2.86
Debra Hauge
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.85
Karen Southern
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.69
Suzy Kaelin
published
2.64
Genny Igo
published 3
2.63
Ann Mailly
published 3
2.54
2.30
Cosette Philpot
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Debra Hauge + Karen Southern5548% games+4.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Melissa George
1W–20L career · no lines in 2022
80%20%<1%
2.89
3
Debra Hauge
73W–64L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%85%14%
2.86
3
Karen Southern
87W–112L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
2.85
Suzy Kaelin
3W–1L career · no lines in 2022
8%92%1%
2.69
3
Genny Igo
3W–4L career · no lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
2.64
3
Ann Mailly
5W–4L career · no lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
2.63
3
Elizabeth Vandecarr
3W–7L career · no lines in 2022
37%63%<1%
2.54
3
Cosette Philpot
30W–74L career · type A · 4 lines in 2022
94%6%<1%
2.30

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.