Teams

SSIKES

2022 Cap Spring USTA 40 & over · 3.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-05-17vs APershkeSplit 11
W#1 DoublesBarb Davis / Mary Strothmann vs Marlet Edwards / Misty Howell6-7, 6-2
L#2 DoublesPriscilla Nanney / Sally Sikes vs Ann Pershke / Josie Tattersall2-6, 3-6
2022-05-03vs DSelf 3.0 40+Won 10
W#1 DoublesMary Strothmann / Priscilla Nanney vs Karen Maus / Lisa Bakowski7-6, 5-5
2022-04-26vs TSchoenLost 01
L#1 DoublesPriscilla Nanney / Mary Strothmann vs Tori Schoen / Tara Spina3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2022-04-19vs KSouthernLost 01
L#1 SinglesChristine Mccorquodale vs Ann Mailly2-6, 5-7
2022-04-05vs APershkeLost 01
L#1 DoublesBarb Davis / Mary Strothmann vs Kari Knoblauch / Mary Elizabeth Phillips3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2022-03-22Lost 01
L#1 DoublesPriscilla Nanney / Mary Strothmann vs Frauke Mirenda / Deborah Self3-6, 4-6
2022-03-15vs TSchoenLost 02
L#1 DoublesJudy Colby / Priscilla Nanney vs Emma Coblentz / Stacey Giglio2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesChristine Mccorquodale vs Tori Schoen4-6, 2-6
2022-03-08vs KSouthernLost 02
L#1 DoublesJudy Colby / Mary Strothmann vs Debra Hauge / Genny Igo6-7, 6-0, 0-1
L#1 SinglesChristine Mccorquodale vs Karen Southern3-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.62 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.96
Mary Strothmann
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.84
Judy Colby
published
2.65
Christine Mccorquodale
usually #1 Singles 89%, also #3 Doubles 11% · published 3
2.63
Christine Rosin
published 3
2.58
Jennifer Diehl
published
2.55
Priscilla Nanney
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.50
Lavonne Moore
published
2.43
Susan Lavrack
published
2.42
Sally Sikes
published
Jane Diepenbrock
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Priscilla Nanney + Mary Strothmann121847% games−2.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Mary Strothmann
111W–114L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%61%39%
2.96
Judy Colby
7W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%11%
2.84
3
Christine Mccorquodale
37W–167L career · 9 lines in 2022
12%87%<1%
2.65
3
Christine Rosin
6W–15L career · no lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
2.63
Jennifer Diehl
1W–6L career · no lines in 2022
26%74%<1%
2.58
3
Priscilla Nanney
41W–122L career · 5 lines in 2022
35%65%<1%
2.55
Lavonne Moore
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
50%50%<1%
2.50
Susan Lavrack
1W–10L career · no lines in 2022
70%30%<1%
2.43
Sally Sikes
1W–10L career · no lines in 2022
73%27%<1%
2.42
Jane Diepenbrock
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.