Teams

Lee/Nashville

2025 Adult 18 & Over - Early Start League-Nashville · 3.5 Women - FRI AM

14 players · average NTRP 3.60 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2024-11-24vs Patterson/NashvilleWon 31
W#1 DoublesBethany Liles / Jill Porter vs Lesly Todesco / Susan Manley6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAmy Greathouse / Stephanie Gounder vs Rebecca Patterson / Sara Baker6-4, 6-1
W#2 SinglesLauren Tuck vs Nancy Preston6-0, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJULIE GONTAREK / Amy Robbins vs Lynn Strevell / Kimberly Jones5-7, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women - FRI AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.61
Bethany Liles
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.46
Lauren Tuck
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.41
Joni Lee
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.40
Amy Greathouse
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.40
JULIE GONTAREK
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.36
Jill Porter
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.36
Stephanie Gillmor
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Brooke Schroeder
published 3.5
3.27
Stephanie Gounder
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.21
Anna Stiller
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.21
Bennett Wolford
published 3.5
3.20
Lisa Jagar
published
3.06
Heather Galloway
published
2.69
Kate Elasy
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joni Lee + Bethany Liles9071% games+18.5% vs expected
Stephanie Gillmor + Bethany Liles224 matchesnot enough data
Stephanie Gillmor + Amy Greathouse213 matchesnot enough data
Amy Greathouse + Joni Lee213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Bethany Liles
13W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.61
Lauren Tuck
16W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%61%39%
3.46
Joni Lee
27W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.41
3.5
Amy Greathouse
8W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.40
JULIE GONTAREK
16W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.40
Jill Porter
12W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%83%16%
3.36
Stephanie Gillmor
22W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
1%84%16%
3.36
3.5
Brooke Schroeder
5W–2L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%5%
3.27
Stephanie Gounder
7W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Anna Stiller
14W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.21
3.5
Bennett Wolford
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
Lisa Jagar
13W–7L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20
Heather Galloway
8W–10L career · no lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.06
Kate Elasy
9W–9L career · no lines in 2025
9%89%1%
2.69

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.