Teams

Mid Court Crisis

2022 USTA MIXED 18 & OVER · 7.0 Mixed 18 & Over

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MONTANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-06-04vs Montana/Rembe/18&Over7.0MXLost 12
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Lund / Andrew Hinnenkamp vs David Dernbach / Laura Rembe4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLauren Cromer / Brian Metzger vs Ray Loomis / Margaret Vralsted0-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesSusie Boyer / Brandon Kelman vs James Luderitz / Cyndy Desin6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2022-06-04vs Montana/Rembe/18&Over7.0MXWon 21
L#1 DoublesSusie Boyer / William Horgan vs Cyndy Desin / David Dernbach1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Lund / Andrew Hinnenkamp vs Margaret Vralsted / Ray Loomis7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAmy Berghold / Brandon Kelman vs Laura Rembe / James Luderitz6-2, 6-4
2022-06-04vs Montana/Rembe/18&Over7.0MXLost 03
L#1 DoublesAmy Berghold / Brandon Kelman vs Laura Rembe / David Dernbach3-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesSusie Boyer / William Horgan vs James Luderitz / Cyndy Desin3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLauren Cromer / Brian Metzger vs Ray Loomis / Margaret Vralsted3-6, 5-7
2022-06-03vs Montana/Rembe/18&Over7.0MXLost 12
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Lund / Andrew Hinnenkamp vs David Dernbach / Cyndy Desin4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesLauren Cromer / Brian Metzger vs Ray Loomis / Margaret Vralsted1-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesSusie Boyer / William Horgan vs Laura Rembe / James Luderitz6-4, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Mixed 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.99
Elizabeth Lund
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
Brian Metzger
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.22
Amy Berghold
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.15
Susie Boyer
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.86
Lauren Cromer
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Andrew Hinnenkamp
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
William Horgan
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susie Boyer + William Horgan123 matchesnot enough data
Lauren Cromer + Brian Metzger033 matchesnot enough data
Elizabeth Lund + Andrew Hinnenkamp123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Elizabeth Lund
78W–50L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%54%46%
3.99
3.5
Brian Metzger
0W–6L career · type T · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Amy Berghold
31W–32L career · 2 lines in 2022
5%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Susie Boyer
32W–47L career · 4 lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.15
3
Lauren Cromer
8W–35L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%86%13%
2.86
Andrew Hinnenkamp
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
William Horgan
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.