Teams

Pelican Landing - Mooney

2022 Collier Combo 50 & Over Spring · 7.5 Combo 50 & over - Women Day

12 players · average NTRP 3.90 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-05-09vs COLLIER - ArchieLost 01
L#3 DoublesCarol Polipnick / Debbie Miller vs Jennifer Archie / Kristine Miller3-6, 5-7
2022-05-02vs Quail West - C. SeeseLost 01
L#2 DoublesSarah Guglielmo / PAMELA ARBOGAST vs JANE BRUDERS / Ginny Asgeirsson6-7, 2-6
2022-04-25vs Grey Hawk - J. HulbertLost 01
L#1 DoublesRebecca Matarazzi / Carol Polipnick vs Mary Wright / Dina Viteretti4-6, 1-6
2022-04-11vs Olde Cypress - NavarroLost 01
L#3 DoublesCarol Polipnick / Terry Diubaldi vs Lori Coates / Claudia Hammon7-5, 2-6, 0-1
2022-04-04vs Heritage Bay - BargerLost 01
L#2 DoublesRebecca Matarazzi / Catherine Ross vs Kathleen Fisch / Diana Pleeter1-6, 1-6
2022-03-28vs Pelican Bay North - ReedLost 01
L#2 DoublesCarol Polipnick / Ellen Davis vs Laura Groark / Judy Howell4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Combo 50 & over - Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Carol Polipnick
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.76
Catherine Prosia
published 4
3.75
Catherine Ross
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.58
Cynthia Emhardt
published 4
3.51
Marjie Killeen
published
Ellen Davis
published 3.5
3.20
Jodi Petkovich
published
Marlene Tatham
published
PAMELA ARBOGAST
published
Rebecca Matarazzi
published
Sarah Guglielmo
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Carol Polipnick
240W–112L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%93%5%
3.79
4
Catherine Prosia
7W–7L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Catherine Ross
17W–23L career · 1 line in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Cynthia Emhardt
3W–5L career · no lines in 2022
28%72%<1%
3.58
Marjie Killeen
4W–12L career · no lines in 2022
46%54%<1%
3.51
3.5
Ellen Davis
3W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Linda Snowden-Kraftzenk
2W–9L career · no lines in 2022
99%1%<1%
3.20
Jodi Petkovich
1W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Marlene Tatham
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
PAMELA ARBOGAST
5W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Rebecca Matarazzi
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Sarah Guglielmo
8W–23L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.