Teams

Olde Cypress - Navarro

2022 Collier Combo 50 & Over Spring · 7.5 Combo 50 & over - Women Day

16 players · average NTRP 3.69 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-05-09vs Cambier - TrombleyWon 21
W#1 DoublesMinde Shinnick / Aggie Rupert vs Caroline Rogers / Kathy O'Connell6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesClaudia Hammon / Susanne Navarro vs Lorraine Kaplan / Maureen Sexson1-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAngela Aline / Judy Kobel vs Toni Trombley / Virginia Southall6-3, 6-2
2022-05-02vs Marco YMCA - WashakWon 20
W#2 DoublesLori Coates / Aggie Rupert vs Kelly Heintzelman / Patricia MacDonald6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLinda Koenig / Karey Hogan vs Brita Swanson / Mia Delk7-6, 5-7, 1-0
2022-04-25vs Esplanade- SteuererWon 20
W#2 DoublesAngela Aline / Judy Kobel vs Alice Meyer / Maureen Salinger6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesLori Caple / Barbara Hurt-Simmons vs Katherine MacWilliams / Lanette Disera-Geissler7-6, 6-1
2022-04-18vs Quail West - C. SeeseWon 20
W#1 DoublesShelley Boggess / Aggie Rupert vs Nyra Rohskopf / Peggy Stefanac1-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesClaudia Hammon / Karey Hogan vs Christine Seese / Faye Johnson3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-04-11vs Pelican Landing - MooneyWon 21
W#1 DoublesMinde Shinnick / Aggie Rupert vs Jennifer Seefeld / Linda Snowden-Kraftzenk6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesLori Caple / Barbara Hurt-Simmons vs Jodi Petkovich / Marjie Killeen2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLori Coates / Claudia Hammon vs Carol Polipnick / Terry Diubaldi5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2022-04-04vs Players Club - J. WautersLost 01
L#3 DoublesShelley Boggess / Judy Kobel vs Jill Wauters / Sue Wolf3-6, 4-6
2022-03-28vs COLLIER - ArchieLost 12
L#1 DoublesLori Coates / Barbara Hurt-Simmons vs Linda Smith / Debra Logue5-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesDot Hall / Minde Shinnick vs Jennifer Archie / Bernadette Devoe6-0, 6-2
L#3 DoublesKarey Hogan / Claudia Hammon vs Joan Stolberg / Veronica Howell2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-03-21vs Pelican Bay North - A.BrooksLost 03
L#1 DoublesLori Caple / Aggie Rupert vs Susan Labriola / Marie France McCloskey6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSusanne Navarro / Linda Koenig vs Dawn Cyr / Beverly Biltz2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAngela Aline / Judy Kobel vs Debra Bowman / Christina Tabarrini4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Combo 50 & over - Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.46 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Minde Shinnick
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.77
Aggie Rupert
published 4
Bethe Halpern
published 4
3.73
Kristen Catino
published
3.73
Karey Hogan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.65
Lori Caple
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.60
Shelley Boggess
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.56
Beth Rainey
published 3.5
3.36
Susanne Navarro
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.26
Linda Koenig
published
3.23
Angela Aline
published 3.5
3.20
Dot Hall
published 3.5
3.18
2.94
Claudia Hammon
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Judy Kobel
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Lori Coates
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Minde Shinnick + Lori Coates312552% games+0.2% vs expected
Lori Coates + Susanne Navarro13851% gamesnot enough data
Karey Hogan + Susanne Navarro8946% gamesnot enough data
Claudia Hammon + Susanne Navarro13362% gamesnot enough data
Minde Shinnick + Karey Hogan4943% gamesnot enough data
Shelley Boggess + Susanne Navarro7548% gamesnot enough data
Karey Hogan + Lori Caple6452% gamesnot enough data
Susanne Navarro + Lori Caple5350% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Minde Shinnick
119W–115L career · 3 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Aggie Rupert
4W–5L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Bethe Halpern
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kristen Catino
23W–21L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
Karey Hogan
91W–110L career · 3 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Lori Caple
130W–93L career · 3 lines in 2022
12%87%<1%
3.65
Shelley Boggess
191W–176L career · 2 lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.60
3.5
Beth Rainey
16W–13L career · no lines in 2022
<1%32%68%
3.56
Susanne Navarro
229W–208L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
3.36
Linda Koenig
51W–27L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Angela Aline
3W–2L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Dot Hall
10W–6L career · type S · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Barbara Hurt-Simmons
11W–15L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Claudia Hammon
80W–104L career · type A · 4 lines in 2022
69%31%<1%
2.94
Judy Kobel
62W–96L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Lori Coates
202W–160L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.