Teams

Walnut Creek TC 40AW3.0B

2022 ADULT 40&Over · Women's 3.0

16 players · average NTRP 3.17 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women's 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.01 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.51
Tracey Hull
published
3.41
Shashanna Singh
published
3.33
Connie J Chang
published 3.5
3.01
Priscilla Z Behidj
published
2.97
Laura Herbert
published
2.95
Karen Bibel
published
2.94
Michelle Saunders
published
2.91
Linda Duchscherer
published
2.89
Maria Debenedetti
published
2.85
Olga Keselman
published
2.84
Penny Lane
published
2.77
Anita Lifson
published 3
Elena Gutkin
published 3
2.73
Shiow-Rong Lin
published
Leslie Souttaphonh
published
Selma Samayoa
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shashanna Singh + Tracey Hull1634% games−8.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tracey Hull
4W–10L career · no lines in 2022
47%53%<1%
3.51
Shashanna Singh
7W–15L career · no lines in 2022
76%24%<1%
3.41
3.5
Connie J Chang
20W–12L career · no lines in 2022
1%89%10%
3.33
Priscilla Z Behidj
35W–33L career · no lines in 2022
<1%48%52%
3.01
Laura Herbert
14W–16L career · no lines in 2022
<1%59%41%
2.97
Karen Bibel
11W–19L career · no lines in 2022
<1%66%34%
2.95
Michelle Saunders
14W–32L career · no lines in 2022
<1%68%32%
2.94
Linda Duchscherer
22W–16L career · no lines in 2022
<1%75%24%
2.91
Maria Debenedetti
29W–10L career · no lines in 2022
<1%80%19%
2.89
Olga Keselman
10W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%12%
2.85
Penny Lane
21W–14L career · no lines in 2022
0%<1%>99%
2.84
3
Anita Lifson
6W–1L career · type M · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Elena Gutkin
2W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Shiow-Rong Lin
5W–4L career · no lines in 2022
0%4%96%
2.73
Leslie Souttaphonh
3W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Selma Samayoa
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.