Teams

TAG GREEN

2021 TRIO - NOCO · WOMEN 3.5 - TRIO - NOCO

8 players · average NTRP 3.57 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2021-04-17vs TAG BLUESplit 11
L#1 DoublesNikki Ellis / Michelle Sheets vs Anne Moyer / Larea Warden4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesBethany Seely / Laura Johnson vs Amber Slade / Lisa Novacek3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2021-04-10vs CSULost 02
L#1 DoublesKelsa Morgan / Nikki Ellis vs Falguni Gill / Lorena Laffitte7-6, 6-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMichelle Sheets / Bethany Seely vs Paige Kanatous / Sherri Kravec5-7, 3-6
2021-04-03vs FCCC TURQUOISELost 02
L#1 DoublesNikki Ellis / Michelle Sheets vs Kelsey Nosler / Haley Hasler4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJennifer Borg / Kelsa Morgan vs Karen Weller / Tahni Clay4-6, 1-6
2021-03-27vs LVTALost 01
L#2 DoublesNikki Ellis / Kelsa Morgan vs Lesa Morrill-Hughes / Dawn Hagen1-6, 6-3, 0-1
2021-03-20vs FCCC PURPLELost 01
L#2 DoublesKelsa Morgan / Alison Benjamin vs Lisa Olsen / Tina Geoghan3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - TRIO - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Bethany Seely
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.48
Arwen Christian
published 3.5
Alison Benjamin
published 3.5
3.13
Janice Mossberg
published 3.5
3.12
Michelle Sheets
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.10
Nikki Ellis
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.88
Kelsa Morgan
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Jennifer Borg
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michelle Sheets + Arwen Christian6260% games+7.0% vs expected
Kelsa Morgan + Nikki Ellis3451% games+2.9% vs expected
Michelle Sheets + Nikki Ellis71543% games−2.9% vs expected
Janice Mossberg + Bethany Seely5075% gamesnot enough data
Janice Mossberg + Arwen Christian314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Bethany Seely
76W–30L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%87%13%
3.85
3.5
Arwen Christian
21W–10L career · no lines in 2021
<1%57%43%
3.48
3.5
Alison Benjamin
3W–4L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Janice Mossberg
121W–94L career · no lines in 2021
15%85%<1%
3.13
3.5
Michelle Sheets
67W–96L career · type A · 3 lines in 2021
17%82%<1%
3.12
3.5
Nikki Ellis
30W–58L career · 4 lines in 2021
23%77%<1%
3.10
3.5
Kelsa Morgan
39W–60L career · 4 lines in 2021
83%17%<1%
2.88
Jennifer Borg
10W–13L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.