Teams

TAG BLUE

2021 TRIO - NOCO · WOMEN 3.5 - TRIO - NOCO

8 players · average NTRP 3.43 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2021-04-17vs TAG GREENSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAnne Moyer / Larea Warden vs Nikki Ellis / Michelle Sheets6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAmber Slade / Lisa Novacek vs Bethany Seely / Laura Johnson3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2021-04-10vs FCCC TURQUOISELost 12
W#1 DoublesLarea Warden / Janet Crespin vs Doreen Evans / Haley Hasler6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMarcia Linley vs Stephanie Kemp1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMarcia Stauter / Mary Krbec vs Tahni Clay / Karen Weller2-6, 3-6
2021-04-03vs FCCC PURPLEWon 20
W#1 DoublesLisa Novacek / Amber Slade vs Jennifer Camp / Lisa Clay6-1, 7-5
W#2 DoublesLarea Warden / Anne Moyer vs Sandra Lautzenheiser / Jane Gronewoller7-5, 6-1
2021-03-27vs CSUWon 20
W#1 DoublesJanet Crespin / Larea Warden vs Falguni Gill / Karen Trevino6-2, 7-6
W#2 DoublesMarcia Linley / Lisa Novacek vs Paige Kanatous / Nicola Allen6-3, 6-0
2021-03-20vs LVTAWon 20
W#1 DoublesLisa Novacek / Amber Slade vs Nancy Pflughoeft / Dawn Petersen6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLarea Warden / Marcia Stauter vs Jaclin Elkins / Lesa Morrill-Hughes6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - TRIO - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Janet Crespin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.41
Lisa Novacek
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Anne Moyer
published 3.5
3.25
Larea Warden
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.20
Amber Slade
published 3.5
3.19
Wendy Chambers
published
3.14
Marcia Linley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
2.67
Marcia Stauter
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Novacek + Amber Slade10454% games+5.8% vs expected
Larea Warden + Janet Crespin833656% games−1.5% vs expected
Larea Warden + Amber Slade2342% gamesnot enough data
Janet Crespin + Amber Slade134 matchesnot enough data
Larea Warden + Lisa Novacek213 matchesnot enough data
Janet Crespin + Marcia Stauter303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Janet Crespin
130W–66L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%61%39%
3.46
3.5
Lisa Novacek
105W–55L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%75%25%
3.41
3.5
Anne Moyer
12W–6L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Larea Warden
110W–61L career · 5 lines in 2021
3%95%2%
3.25
3.5
Amber Slade
46W–43L career · no lines in 2021
6%93%1%
3.20
Wendy Chambers
10W–20L career · no lines in 2021
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Marcia Linley
27W–68L career · 2 lines in 2021
14%86%<1%
3.14
3
Marcia Stauter
93W–81L career · 2 lines in 2021
9%90%1%
2.67

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.