Teams

FLYHS LEVKUS

2024 CTA TWILIGHT - SOCO · WOMEN 4.0 - TWILIGHT - SOCO

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-08-26vs MEMPK LOWERYLost 12
W#1 DoublesJamie Roach / Melissa Morino vs Maggie Hartman / Gina Scheper6-3, 7-5
L#1 SinglesElayna Rathmann vs Shelby Johnson2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesChelsey Wright / Catherine Mast vs Olivia Boudreau / Carmen Ekblad4-6, 3-6
2024-08-19vs LTFCS KALTENBACHERWon 20
W#1 DoublesAmy Saxby / Chelsey Wright vs Salome D'Silva / Susan Hilton6-1, 6-0
W#1 SinglesElayna Rathmann vs Tatiana Merkoulova6-4, 6-0
2024-08-12vs CSRC MACLIZWon 10
W#1 DoublesMelissa Morino / Leslie Jaworowski vs Nancy Barker / Jennifer Emerson6-1, 6-1
2024-08-05vs PBTC TUCKERWon 10
W#1 DoublesMelissa Morino / Maggie Wilson vs Julie Larson / Alyssa Parga6-0, 6-4
2024-07-29vs CSRC MCPHERSONWon 21
W#1 DoublesMelissa Morino / Jamie Roach vs Kady Hommel / Stephanie King6-2, 6-3
L#1 SinglesElayna Rathmann vs Jennifer Kapitan2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesAmy Saxby / Chelsey Wright vs Diana Garcia-Poore / Carolayne Henry6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - TWILIGHT - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.84 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.17
Melissa Morino
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.94
Jamie Roach
published
3.93
Amy Saxby
published 4
3.90
Leslie Jaworowski
published
3.81
Chelsey Wright
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.58
Elayna Rathmann
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.54
Catherine Mast
published 4
Julie Brunner
published
Lori Schmucker
published
Martina Levkus
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jamie Roach + Melissa Morino15072% games+12.5% vs expected
Chelsey Wright + Amy Saxby11363% games+1.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Melissa Morino
106W–19L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%12%88%
4.17
Jamie Roach
15W–1L career · no lines in 2024
<1%65%35%
3.94
4
Amy Saxby
29W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%69%31%
3.93
Leslie Jaworowski
15W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%76%23%
3.90
4
Chelsey Wright
53W–40L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.81
4
Elayna Rathmann
75W–99L career · 3 lines in 2024
29%71%<1%
3.58
4
Catherine Mast
6W–22L career · no lines in 2024
38%62%<1%
3.54
Julie Brunner
3W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Lori Schmucker
2W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Martina Levkus
16W–10L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.