Teams

CSRC MACLIZ

2024 CTA TWILIGHT - SOCO · WOMEN 4.0 - TWILIGHT - SOCO

8 players · average NTRP 3.90 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-09-02vs LTFCS KALTENBACHERWon 20
W#1 DoublesJennifer Emerson / Monica MacLiz vs WENDY WESTON / Chantel Rosario6-0, 6-4
W#2 DoublesOlivia Salmon / Theresa Watson vs Ann Grumann / Jennifer Madden6-3, 7-5
2024-08-28vs MEMPK LOWERYLost 03
L#1 DoublesOlivia Salmon / Theresa Watson vs Kristen Lowery / Olivia Boudreau6-7, 6-7
L#1 SinglesMonica MacLiz vs Maggie Hartman1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesCandace McCollett / Christina Bardsley vs Shelby Johnson / Sara Breese3-6, 2-6
2024-08-26vs PBTC TUCKERWon 10
W#2 DoublesJennifer Emerson / Candace McCollett vs Jeannette Ortiz / Julie Larson6-2, 6-4
2024-08-12vs FLYHS LEVKUSSplit 11
W#1 SinglesMonica MacLiz vs Martina Levkus6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCandace McCollett / Olivia Salmon vs Julie Brunner / Amy Saxby5-7, 2-6
2024-08-05vs CSRC MCPHERSONLost 01
L#1 DoublesNancy Barker / Olivia Salmon vs Kelly Banet / Kateri Kerwin3-6, 4-6
2024-07-29vs LTFCS KALTENBACHERLost 02
L#1 DoublesJennifer Emerson / Olivia Salmon vs Salome D'Silva / Cindy Yetter6-7, 4-6
L#1 SinglesCandace McCollett vs Janae Kite4-6, 3-6
2024-07-22vs PBTC TUCKERSplit 11
W#1 SinglesMonica MacLiz vs Megan Moore6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesCandace McCollett / Vikki ONeil vs Leah Ann Tucker / Alyssa Parga3-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - TWILIGHT - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.72 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.86
Nancy Barker
published
3.79
Olivia Salmon
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.77
Monica MacLiz
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.68
3.66
Candace McCollett
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 4
3.55
Theresa Watson
published
Alison Shaw
published 3.5
Vikki ONeil
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nancy Barker + Olivia Salmon8453% games−0.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nancy Barker
54W–18L career · no lines in 2024
<1%83%16%
3.86
4
Olivia Salmon
56W–33L career · 5 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Monica MacLiz
57W–47L career · 4 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Christina Bardsley
8W–21L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.68
4
Candace McCollett
58W–104L career · 5 lines in 2024
13%86%1%
3.66
Theresa Watson
4W–14L career · no lines in 2024
35%65%<1%
3.55
3.5
Alison Shaw
9W–7L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Vikki ONeil
5W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.