Teams

Men's Quads

2024 · 2025 NOGTA Quads - Fall '24

20 players · average NTRP 3.25 / GEORGIA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 2025 NOGTA Quads - Fall '24 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.97 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
Gireeshkumar Gopinathakaimal
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.29
Dwayne Bordelon
published
3.29
Jacob Quast
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.11
Scott Higgins
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.11
Brian Hammontree
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.06
Scott King
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
2.98
Phil Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.67
James Stanfield
published
2.65
Gene King
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.59
Brock Champion
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.55
Santiago Angel
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Bryson Thacker
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Casey Ridley
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Douglas Terry
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Gregorio Rojas
published
Jim Richards
published
Manuel Guzman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Ricardo Pedrotti
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Robert Caperton
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Zac Raughton
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brian Hammontree + Scott King5072% games+12.9% vs expected
Phil Johnson + Gireeshkumar Gopinathakaimal3254% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Gireeshkumar Gopinathakaimal
8W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.33
Dwayne Bordelon
0W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%2%98%
3.29
Jacob Quast
23W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%2%98%
3.29
Scott Higgins
31W–24L career · 3 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.11
3.5
Brian Hammontree
30W–7L career · 6 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.11
Scott King
42W–12L career · 6 lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
3.06
Phil Johnson
3W–12L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
2.98
James Stanfield
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
2.67
Gene King
4W–9L career · 6 lines in 2025
14%85%1%
2.65
3
Brock Champion
6W–5L career · type S · 6 lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
2.59
Santiago Angel
2W–12L career · 5 lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
2.55
Bryson Thacker
2W–5L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
Casey Ridley
3W–5L career · 8 lines in 2025
not enough data
Douglas Terry
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Gregorio Rojas
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jim Richards
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Manuel Guzman
2W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Ricardo Pedrotti
0W–5L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Robert Caperton
5W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Zac Raughton
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.