Teams

2-APlachco-Eno

2022 Eno River Singles 18 & Over · Adult 18 & Over 4.5 Women Evening

6 players · average NTRP 4.40 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-08-02vs 5-Cannon/Cox -EnoWon 20
W#1 SinglesZoe Dubrow vs Kathleen Cannon6-3, 6-3
W#3 SinglesAna Plachco vs Carolyn Lee6-3, 6-1
2022-07-28Won 10
W#2 SinglesAna Plachco vs Olivia Ward6-0, 6-1
2022-07-18Won 20
W#1 SinglesZoe Dubrow vs Madison Harmon6-4, 6-3
W#2 SinglesAna Plachco vs Randy Smith6-1, 6-0
2022-06-22Won 10
W#2 SinglesAna Plachco vs Chace Ogle6-4, 6-3
2022-06-20vs 5-Cannon/Cox -EnoWon 10
W#1 SinglesZoe Dubrow vs Kamila Korzeniowska6-4, 6-1
2022-06-09Won 10
W#1 SinglesZoe Dubrow vs Geraldine Smith6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 18 & Over 4.5 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.06 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.31
Elaine Schnabel
published 4.5
4.22
Zoe Dubrow
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4.5
4.08
Cheryl Reid
published 4.5
4.07
Sara Barfield
published
3.94
Ana Plachco
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #3 Singles 25% · published 4.5
3.75
Jamie Harford
published 4
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Elaine Schnabel
12W–15L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%8%
4.31
4.5
Zoe Dubrow
101W–75L career · 4 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
4.22
4.5
Cheryl Reid
43W–42L career · no lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
4.08
Sara Barfield
13W–10L career · no lines in 2022
29%71%<1%
4.07
4.5
Ana Plachco
150W–121L career · 4 lines in 2022
67%33%<1%
3.94
4
Jamie Harford
6W–5L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.