Teams

Racq Pacq

2021 18&Over Mixed · 8.0

12 players · average NTRP 4.14 / NEW JERSEY REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2021-04-11vs DNALost 12
L#1 DoublesSamuel Ulfsson / Gabriela Medina vs Wuon Hong / Michelle Kim1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesRobert Khalev / Tracy Jones-Henry vs Michael Huh / Tomira Rozar6-4, 7-5
L#3 DoublesPeter Ortiz / Lissa Canavan vs Thomas Kim / Sophie Yoon1-6, 1-6
2021-04-10vs Racquet ScientistsWon 21
W#1 DoublesRyan Kim / JAN NELSON vs Daniel Plotnick / Wendy Boiardi6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesGabriela Medina / Samuel Ulfsson vs Daniel Zimmon / Lily Riedel2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesPeter Ortiz / Antaeya Foster vs Bobby Choe / Julia Cho6-3, 6-3
2021-03-27vs NJ: Sweet VictorySplit 11
L#2 DoublesRobert Khalev / Hannah McLaughlin vs Christopher Chan / Stephanie Heitner5-7, 0-6
W#3 DoublesJAN NELSON / Carlos Vasquez Sr vs Edina Jung / Glenn Dykstra6-1, 6-3
2021-03-20vs Racquet ScientistsWon 21
W#1 DoublesRobert Khalev / Tracy Jones-Henry vs Bobby Choe / Wendy Boiardi6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesCarlos Vasquez Sr / JAN NELSON vs Peter Shields / Astrid Kaiser7-5, 6-2
L#3 DoublesGabriela Medina / Peter Ortiz vs Craig Spenner / Lily Riedel1-6, 1-6
2021-03-13vs DNALost 03
L#1 DoublesRobert Khalev / Hannah McLaughlin vs James Ong / Tomira Rozar4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCarlos Vasquez Sr / JAN NELSON vs Wuon Hong / Sophie Yoon6-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesPeter Ortiz / Antaeya Foster vs Michael Huh / Michelle Kim5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2021-03-06vs NJ: Sweet VictorySplit 11
L#1 DoublesJAN NELSON / David Schwartz vs Donna Ricker / Allan Orchard5-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesRobert Khalev / Tracy Jones-Henry vs Eric Levitch / Cecilia Orchard6-4, 6-2
2021-02-27vs Southern: Vista: 8.0 Is EnoughWon 21
L#1 DoublesRobert Khalev / JAN NELSON vs Dorothy Spenner / Peter Shields6-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesCarlos Vasquez Sr / Hannah McLaughlin vs Craig Spenner / Amanda Connell7-6, 6-0
W#3 DoublesPeter Ortiz / Antaeya Foster vs Julia Cho / Luis Torres7-5, 6-3
2021-02-20vs DNAWon 21
L#1 DoublesPeter Ortiz / Gabriela Medina vs Wuon Hong / Ann Callari-Solomon1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesCarlos Vasquez Sr / JAN NELSON vs Bobby Kim / Michelle Kim6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesRobert Khalev / Tracy Jones-Henry vs John Chalerm / Ji Park6-2, 6-3
2021-02-13vs NJ: Sweet VictoryLost 12
L#1 DoublesRobert Khalev / Hannah McLaughlin vs Jon Rubinstein / Donna Ricker3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesCarlos Vasquez Sr / Tracy Jones-Henry vs Glenn Dykstra / Rebecca Wehrle3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesPeter Ortiz / Gabriela Medina vs Joshua Peters / Morgan McGuire5-7, 6-1, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.81 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.38
David Schwartz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Antaeya Foster
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published 4.5
4.23
Carlos Vasquez Sr
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4.5
4.15
Robert Khalev
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
4.12
Gabriela Medina
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
3.58
Hannah McLaughlin
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.45
JAN NELSON
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published 3.5
3.44
Peter Ortiz
usually #3 Doubles 86%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.15
Tracy Jones-Henry
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published
Mohamed Talaat
published
Ryan Kim
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Samuel Ulfsson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Hannah McLaughlin + Carlos Vasquez Sr8160% games+11.6% vs expected
Peter Ortiz + Gabriela Medina2534% gamesnot enough data
Peter Ortiz + Antaeya Foster5255% gamesnot enough data
JAN NELSON + Carlos Vasquez Sr5257% gamesnot enough data
Tracy Jones-Henry + Robert Khalev404 matchesnot enough data
Hannah McLaughlin + Robert Khalev033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
David Schwartz
85W–26L career · 1 line in 2021
<1%81%18%
4.38
4.5
Antaeya Foster
91W–35L career · 10 lines in 2021
not enough data
4.5
Carlos Vasquez Sr
114W–90L career · 6 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
4.23
Robert Khalev
72W–40L career · 8 lines in 2021
12%87%<1%
4.15
4.5
Gabriela Medina
54W–38L career · 5 lines in 2021
17%83%<1%
4.12
4
Hannah McLaughlin
127W–71L career · 10 lines in 2021
26%74%<1%
3.58
3.5
JAN NELSON
44W–34L career · 14 lines in 2021
<1%66%34%
3.45
3.5
Peter Ortiz
94W–209L career · 7 lines in 2021
<1%69%31%
3.44
Tracy Jones-Henry
58W–49L career · 10 lines in 2021
12%88%<1%
3.15
Mohamed Talaat
11W–4L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Ryan Kim
6W–6L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data
Samuel Ulfsson
3W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.