Teams

DNA

2021 18&Over Mixed · 8.0

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NEW JERSEY REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2021-04-24vs NJ: Sweet VictoryWon 21
W#1 DoublesBobby Kim / Sophie Yoon vs Eric Levitch / Cecilia Orchard6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMarijus Kuzavas / Tomira Rozar vs Morgan McGuire / Joshua Peters6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesThomas Kim / Qiming Hui vs Casey Schnabel / Samantha Mulcahy2-6, 2-6
2021-04-11vs Racq PacqLost 01
L#2 DoublesMichael Huh / Tomira Rozar vs Robert Khalev / Tracy Jones-Henry4-6, 5-7
2021-04-10vs NJ: Sweet VictoryLost 03
L#1 DoublesAnn Callari-Solomon / Bobby Kim vs Kimberly Mark / Jon Rubinstein3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesThomas Kim / Tomira Rozar vs Allan Orchard / Donna Ricker2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMarijus Kuzavas / Ji Park vs Christopher Chan / Stephanie Heitner0-6, 7-5, 0-1
2021-03-27vs Racquet ScientistsLost 12
L#1 DoublesJohn Chalerm / Ji Park vs Daniel Plotnick / Wendy Boiardi1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMarijus Kuzavas / Kristin Krongard vs Luis Torres / Trisha Dugan3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesThomas Kim / Qiming Hui vs Craig Spenner / Amanda Connell7-5, 6-2
2021-03-20vs NJ: Sweet VictorySplit 11
L#1 DoublesThomas Kim / Kristin Krongard vs Allan Orchard / Donna Ricker5-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesMichael Huh / Michelle Kim vs Peter Snell / Hildi Todrin5-7, 7-5, 1-0
2021-03-13vs Racq PacqWon 20
W#1 DoublesJames Ong / Tomira Rozar vs Robert Khalev / Hannah McLaughlin6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMichael Huh / Michelle Kim vs Peter Ortiz / Antaeya Foster7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2021-03-06vs Racquet ScientistsWon 21
L#1 DoublesJohn Chalerm / Qiming Hui vs Luis Torres / Wendy Boiardi2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesBobby Kim / Sophie Yoon vs Bobby Choe / Julia Cho6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMarijus Kuzavas / Ji Park vs Daniel Plotnick / Dorothy Spenner6-4, 6-3
2021-02-27vs NJ: Sweet VictoryWon 21
L#1 DoublesJames Ong / Tomira Rozar vs Joseph Graziano / Sue Pangis7-6, 2-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesWuon Hong / Ann Callari-Solomon vs Peter Snell / Hildi Todrin7-6, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMichael Huh / Michelle Kim vs Marc Cohen / Edina Jung6-2, 6-3
2021-02-20vs Racq PacqLost 12
W#1 DoublesWuon Hong / Ann Callari-Solomon vs Peter Ortiz / Gabriela Medina6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesBobby Kim / Michelle Kim vs Carlos Vasquez Sr / JAN NELSON3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJohn Chalerm / Ji Park vs Robert Khalev / Tracy Jones-Henry2-6, 3-6
2021-02-13vs Southern: Vista: 8.0 Is EnoughLost 02
L#1 DoublesMichael Huh / Kristin Krongard vs Luis Torres / Robin McFadden6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMarijus Kuzavas / Qiming Hui vs Craig Spenner / Lily Riedel6-3, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 8.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Racquet Scientists09101737271
2NJ: Sweet Victory010181232272
3DNA010161432267

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.74 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

James Ong
usually #1 Doubles 88%, also #3 Doubles 13% · published 4.5
3.95
Marijus Kuzavas
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published
3.82
Tomira Rozar
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.69
Bobby Kim
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.48
Ji Park
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
Ann Callari-Solomon
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
John Chalerm
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Kristin Krongard
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Michael Huh
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published
Qiming Hui
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Wendy Kim
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
James Ong
15W–8L career · 8 lines in 2021
not enough data
Marijus Kuzavas
246W–105L career · 10 lines in 2021
65%35%<1%
3.95
Tomira Rozar
87W–63L career · 5 lines in 2021
1%91%9%
3.82
4
Bobby Kim
103W–72L career · 4 lines in 2021
8%91%1%
3.69
4
Ji Park
48W–34L career · 4 lines in 2021
56%44%<1%
3.48
3.5
Ann Callari-Solomon
39W–23L career · 8 lines in 2021
not enough data
John Chalerm
22W–28L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Kristin Krongard
49W–47L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Michael Huh
64W–41L career · 11 lines in 2021
not enough data
Qiming Hui
15W–30L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Wendy Kim
2W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.