Teams

Simply Smashing

2021 USTA Adult 55 & Over · Women 7.0 - 55 & Over

6 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MONTANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2021-06-19vs No Strings AttachedWon 20
W#1 DoublesRuby Graham / Cindy Woods vs Diane Larsen / Patti Danforth6-1, 7-5
W#2 DoublesBarbara Beck / Cyndy Desin vs Nancy Larson / Sheila Schaub7-5, 6-3
2021-06-19vs Montana RacqueteersLost 03
L#1 DoublesRuby Graham / Cindy Woods vs Hiroko Yerkey / Jennifer Molinar3-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesCyndy Desin / Barbara Beck vs Sherry Varner / Terri Ruthruff0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDebbie Oliver / Kellie Saville vs Rebecca Jasmine / Victoria van Zile4-6, 3-6
2021-06-18vs 55 Shades of GreyWon 21
W#1 DoublesRuby Graham / Cindy Woods vs Cathy Lower / Patrice Jackson6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesCyndy Desin / Shannon Johnson vs Peggy Manning / Joanne Brekjern3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDebbie Oliver / Kellie Saville vs Sandrah MacK / Judy Klein6-2, 6-4
2021-06-17vs Aces HighWon 21
W#1 DoublesRuby Graham / Cindy Woods vs Beth Groshens / Arianna Whitman6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesCyndy Desin / Shannon Johnson vs Mary Milkovich / Dwanna Landrum5-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesKellie Saville / Debbie Oliver vs DIANA RAIMONDO / Dorothy Warner7-6, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 7.0 - 55 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Ruby Graham
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Barbara Beck
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
Cindy Woods
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.93
Cyndy Desin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Debbie Oliver
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kellie Saville
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cyndy Desin + Ruby Graham9453% games+1.7% vs expected
Barbara Beck + Cyndy Desin4549% games−1.7% vs expected
Cyndy Desin + Cindy Woods3346% games−3.5% vs expected
Kellie Saville + Debbie Oliver2445% gamesnot enough data
Ruby Graham + Cindy Woods4255% gamesnot enough data
Barbara Beck + Kellie Saville2348% gamesnot enough data
Kellie Saville + Cindy Woods213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ruby Graham
31W–16L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%48%52%
3.50
3.5
Barbara Beck
9W–24L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Cindy Woods
15W–21L career · 4 lines in 2021
15%84%<1%
3.13
3.5
Cyndy Desin
59W–102L career · 4 lines in 2021
71%29%<1%
2.93
Debbie Oliver
5W–11L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Kellie Saville
14W–23L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.